Abstract:BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the potential adverse effects of ethylbenzene (EB) on reproductive capability from whole-body inhalation exposure of F 0 and F 1 parental animals. METHODS: Four groups of Crl:CD(SD)IGS BR rats (30/sex/group for F 0 and 25/sex/group for F 1 ) were exposed to 0, 25, 100, and 500 ppm EB for 6 hr/day for at least 70 consecutive days before mating. Inhalation exposure for the F 0 and F 1 females continued throughout mating, gestation through gestation day (GD) 20, an… Show more
“…Several reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of ethylbenzene have been reported previously Hardin et al, 1981;Ungvary and Tatrai, 1985;Saillenfait et al, 2003;Faber et al, 2006). Narcotic effects from acute inhalation exposures have been reported in male rats exposed to 2180 ppm ethylbenzene (Molnár et al, 1986) and mice exposed to 2000 ppm ethylbenzene (Tegeris and Balster, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to these standard assessments within the two-generation study, blood samples were collected on lactation day (LD) 4 and 22 from a subset of F 1 -generation dams as well as from culled F 2 offspring from those dams on postnatal day (PND) 4 and an additional pup/gender/litter (not selected to continue on study in the developmental neurotoxicity component) from those dams after weaning and a single day of direct exposure to ethylbenzene on PND 22. The results concerning the reproductive outcome of the ethylbenzene two-generation toxicity study as well as maternal and offspring blood levels of ethylbenzene have been reported previously (Faber et al, 2006). In most inhalation reproductive toxicity studies that do not include whole body exposures of entire litters, maternal inhalation exposures are stopped temporarily from gestation day (GD) 20 through LD 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The developmental neurotoxicity study component presented was an F 2 -generation assessment added on to a two-generation inhalation reproductive toxicity study (Faber et al, 2006). It was undertaken in support of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Voluntary Children's Chemical Exposure Program (VCCEP) assessment of ethylbenzene (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the two-generation study (Faber et al, 2006), a preliminary study was conducted to determine: the exposure levels of ethylbenzene that would generate minimal maternal and weanling toxicity but allow successful completion of gestation, parturition, and lactation processes; the feasibility of gavage dosing of dams during LD 1-4; and whether to begin inhalation exposures of F 1 weanlings on PND 22 or PND 29 in that study. Male and female rats were exposed daily to either clean filtered air or vapor atmospheres of 100, 500, or 1000 ppm (parts per million) ethylbenzene 6 hr/day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parental exposure levels were 0, 25, 100, and 500 ppm, and gavage dose levels on LD 1-4 were 0, 26, 90, and 342 mg/ kg/day (Faber et al, 2006) …”
The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and developmental neurotoxicity in this study was considered to be 500 ppm/342 mg/kg/day ethylbenzene, the highest exposure level tested in the study.
“…Several reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of ethylbenzene have been reported previously Hardin et al, 1981;Ungvary and Tatrai, 1985;Saillenfait et al, 2003;Faber et al, 2006). Narcotic effects from acute inhalation exposures have been reported in male rats exposed to 2180 ppm ethylbenzene (Molnár et al, 1986) and mice exposed to 2000 ppm ethylbenzene (Tegeris and Balster, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to these standard assessments within the two-generation study, blood samples were collected on lactation day (LD) 4 and 22 from a subset of F 1 -generation dams as well as from culled F 2 offspring from those dams on postnatal day (PND) 4 and an additional pup/gender/litter (not selected to continue on study in the developmental neurotoxicity component) from those dams after weaning and a single day of direct exposure to ethylbenzene on PND 22. The results concerning the reproductive outcome of the ethylbenzene two-generation toxicity study as well as maternal and offspring blood levels of ethylbenzene have been reported previously (Faber et al, 2006). In most inhalation reproductive toxicity studies that do not include whole body exposures of entire litters, maternal inhalation exposures are stopped temporarily from gestation day (GD) 20 through LD 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The developmental neurotoxicity study component presented was an F 2 -generation assessment added on to a two-generation inhalation reproductive toxicity study (Faber et al, 2006). It was undertaken in support of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Voluntary Children's Chemical Exposure Program (VCCEP) assessment of ethylbenzene (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the two-generation study (Faber et al, 2006), a preliminary study was conducted to determine: the exposure levels of ethylbenzene that would generate minimal maternal and weanling toxicity but allow successful completion of gestation, parturition, and lactation processes; the feasibility of gavage dosing of dams during LD 1-4; and whether to begin inhalation exposures of F 1 weanlings on PND 22 or PND 29 in that study. Male and female rats were exposed daily to either clean filtered air or vapor atmospheres of 100, 500, or 1000 ppm (parts per million) ethylbenzene 6 hr/day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parental exposure levels were 0, 25, 100, and 500 ppm, and gavage dose levels on LD 1-4 were 0, 26, 90, and 342 mg/ kg/day (Faber et al, 2006) …”
The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and developmental neurotoxicity in this study was considered to be 500 ppm/342 mg/kg/day ethylbenzene, the highest exposure level tested in the study.
Veröffentlicht in der Reihe
Gesundheitsschädliche Arbeitsstoffe
, 52. Lieferung, Ausgabe 2012
Der Artikel enthält folgende Kapitel:
Allgemeiner Wirkungscharakter
Wirkungsmechanismus
Toxikokinetik und Metabolismus
Erfahrungen beim Menschen
Genotoxizität
Tierexperimentelle Befunde und In‐vitro‐Untersuchungen
Akute Toxizität
Subakute, subchronische und chronische Toxizität
Wirkung auf Haut und Schleimhäute
Allergene Wirkung
Reproduktionstoxizität
Genotoxizität
Kanzerogenität
Sonstige Wirkungen
Bewertung
The article contains sections titled:
Toxic Effects and Mode of Action
Mechanism of Action
Toxicokinetics and Metabolism
Effects in Humans
Genotoxicity
Animal Experiments and in vitro Studies
Acute toxicity
Subacute, subchronic and chronic toxicity
Manifesto (MAK value, classification)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.