Two forms of realism in political theory

Abstract

This paper explores contemporary debates about the meaning and value of realism in political theory. I seek to move beyond the widespread observation that realism encompasses a diverse set of critiques and commitments, by urging that we recognize two key strands in recent realist thought. Detachment realists claim that political theory is excessively abstract and infeasible and thereby fails adequately to inform actual political decision-making. Displacement critics, on the other hand, suggest that political theory threatens or disrespects real politics. Not only are these visions of realism very different, there are also important tensions between them. I focus, in particular, on clarifying and evaluating the more complex charge that political theory displaces politics.

Smashing the state gently: Radical realism and realist anarchism

“…The directive that we should recognise the importance of history, contingency and context in political thought (Baderin, 2014: 144; Rossi and Sleat, 2014: 7) also has particular radical interpretations and implications. The acceptance that ‘politics is historically located’ (Geuss, 2008: 13) might inspire recognition of moments of historical rupture – of reform, revolt and revolution – and serve as a reminder of the constancy of social change, the ubiquity of resistance against illegitimate authority and that society could be radically otherwise (Chomsky, 1996: 85–86).…”

Political realism as ideology critique

“…So realism can be a distinctive view only insofar as it picks out a specific subset of feasibility constraints (e.g. those to do with power) that are sometimes overlooked by mainstream, Rawlsian nonideal theory (Baderin, 2014). Or perhaps realism can bypass reference to an ideal when devising the nonideal, along the lines of Sen's 'comparative' approach to justice (Raekstad, 2015).…”

The Donor’s Dilemma: International Aid and Human Rights Violations

“…There are of course other ways in which normative theory can be sensitive to reality, for example by taking into feasibility constraints or public opinion. For a discussion, see Baderin 2014;Sleat 2016. for example, are specific to political conduct. Second, while moral concerns play a role in political conduct, political actors also pursue ends that cannot be subsumed into moral ends, such as order and stability.…”

“…There are of course other ways in which normative theory can be sensitive to reality, for example by taking into account feasibility constraints or public opinion. For a discussion, see Baderin (2014) and Sleat (2016).…”