2002
DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.2.947-951.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Forms of NAD-Dependent d -Mandelate Dehydrogenase in Enterococcus faecalis IAM 10071

Abstract: Two forms of NAD-dependent d-mandelate dehydrogenase (d-ManDHs) were purified from Enterococcus faecalis IAM 10071. While these two enzymes consistently exhibited high activity toward large 2-ketoacid substrates that were branched at the C3 or C4 position, they gave distinctly different Km and V max values for these substrates and had distinct molecular weights by gel electrophoresis and gel filtration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recombinant enzyme was purified by essentially the same purification procedure as that used for native D-ManDH2, and it exhibited an apparent molecular weight of 40 kDa on SDS-PAGE ( Fig. 2A), in good agreement with that of native D-ManDH2, 28) although somewhat larger than the molecular weight (34,331 Da) calculated from the deduced primary structure of the enzyme (see Fig. 3A) for unknown reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The recombinant enzyme was purified by essentially the same purification procedure as that used for native D-ManDH2, and it exhibited an apparent molecular weight of 40 kDa on SDS-PAGE ( Fig. 2A), in good agreement with that of native D-ManDH2, 28) although somewhat larger than the molecular weight (34,331 Da) calculated from the deduced primary structure of the enzyme (see Fig. 3A) for unknown reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…3A) for unknown reasons. 28) the recombinant enzyme showed V m values for most substrates similar to those of DManDH2, rather than D-ManDH1. Together with the apparent molecular weight (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations