Two Floods, A Wildfire, and A Hurricane: The Role of the Canadian Armed Forces in Emergency Management

Abstract

The role of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) during domestic disaster response has increased significantly over the last century due to the military's response capacity and the increased frequency and impact of natural hazards. However, there has been no systematic academic assessment of how effectively CAF is integrated into the civilian emergency management system, particularly during the response phase. Using archival analysis and interviews with senior CAF officers and civilian officials, this study fills that gap with an examination of four of Canada's worst and most recent natural disasters: Hurricane Igor (2010), the Assiniboine River flood (2011), the Alberta multi-river floods (2013), and the Saskatchewan wildfires (2015). Each event was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of CAF-civilian response across different hazards, provincial jurisdictions, and CAF Joint Task Forces.The analysis is broken down into descriptive, evaluative, and normative concepts to assess the presence and quality of, and barriers to, interorganizational collaboration throughout each response. The presence of interorganizational collaboration was high across all events while the quality of such collaboration was moderately high with room for improvement. Barriers to interorganizational collaboration were low, although conceptual differences on the scope of the formal Request for Assistance and the value of defining 'disaster end states' did adversely affect collaboration between military and civilian organizations. Lack of resources generally did not adversely affect levels of interorganizational collaboration, except through the limited availability of Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) aircraft and the limited emergency management capacity of most municipalities. Organizational traits such as conceptions of reality unique to an organization type had more influence on the level of interorganizational collaboration compared to jurisdiction or hazard type, with only wildfires having a hazard-specific effect on such collaboration.The results of this study have implications for emergency management practitioners, as well as the academic literatures of emergency management, public administration, and civil-military relations. Three policy recommendations -the expansion of emergency management networks, the maintenance of Canada's decentralized emergency management system, and additional disaster response resources for the RCAF and municipalities -are presented in the study's conclusion to improve Canadian disaster response.

Cross-jurisdictional disaster preparedness: A Nigeria-USA data-analytical approach

“…Studies have identified factors influencing successful collaboration, such as clear communication channels, shared resources, and mutual trust and respect among stakeholders. One notable example of cross-jurisdictional collaboration is the partnership between the USA and Canada in managing shared natural hazards, such as wildfires and floods (Botha, 2018;Adebayo, 2022). Research has shown that this collaboration has led to improved information sharing, joint planning and training exercises, and coordinated response efforts during disasters.…”

An Examination of Social Capital and Communications in Municipal Emergency Management

“…This view is also supported and highlighted in the professional literature in the emergency management field, as well as textbook chapters (B. D. Phillips et al, 2016;Rodríguez et al, 2007;Thomas et al, 2009). Within the literature on emergency management, the outlined relationships and communications have been evaluated in dissertations (Botha, 2018;Martini, 2014;Plance, 2018), and a considerable body of scholarly work on emergency preparedness (Kohn et al, 2012;Levac et al, 2012) supports the following hypotheses:…”

“…Policy formulation specific to this subfield follows this inclusionary theoretical model of multiple streams and structures, with several important voices. It is important to understand the methodologies used by governments to identify issues and develop policies -specifically in a multi-level governance structure such as emergency management within Canada (Botha, 2018), which follows a predictable path outside immediate events, similar to normal policy operations (Henstra, 2010(Henstra, , 2011.…”