1998
DOI: 10.1038/31635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two feathered dinosaurs from northeastern China

Abstract: Current controversy over the origin and early evolution of birds centres on whether or not they are derived from coelurosaurian theropod dinosaurs. Here we describe two theropods from the Upper Jurassic/Lower Cretaceous Chaomidianzi Formation of Liaoning province, China. Although both theropods have feathers, it is likely that neither was able to fly. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that they are both more primitive than the earliest known avialan (bird), Archaeopteryx. These new fossils represent stages in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
145
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 501 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
145
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1a) for comparison are also presumably melanosomes. Feathers in dinosaurs may also preserve melanosomes, although they have yet to be investigated; colour banding has been reported in feathers of the Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Caudipteryx zoui (Ji et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a) for comparison are also presumably melanosomes. Feathers in dinosaurs may also preserve melanosomes, although they have yet to be investigated; colour banding has been reported in feathers of the Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Caudipteryx zoui (Ji et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet larger and presumably flight-incapable adult theropods have been discovered with feathered forelimbs (e.g. Caudipteryx [36,37]; Velociraptor [38]) that perhaps generated useful aerodynamic forces only for the diminutive juveniles. Recently, Xu et al [39] reported a dinosaur, Similicaudipteryx, that appears to exhibit changing feather morphology with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…omnivorous) (see electronic supplementary material for dietary terminology). Specifically, the discovery of diminutive conical teeth, keratinous rhamphotheca (Norell et al 2001) and gastric mill (Kobayashi et al 1999) has been proposed as evidence for herbivory in ornithomimosaurs; the 'glirodont' dentition of Incisivosaurus (Xu et al 2002a) and Protarchaeopteryx ( Ji & Ji 1997) and the gastric mill of Caudipteryx (Ji et al 1998) are espoused as evidence for herbivory in oviraptorosaurs; and the widely spaced, coarse dental serrations of some derived troodontids are more congruent with the dentition of extant herbivorous squamates such as iguanids than of obligate carnivores (Holtz et al 1998). Widespread speculation of herbivory among coelurosaurian dinosaurs notwithstanding, the utility of morphological features alleged to correlate with diet in coelurosaurian theropods has not been tested analytically, nor have reconstructions of dietary evolution been subjected to empirical scrutiny within a character-comprehensive, species-level phylogenetic framework.…”
Section: Palaeobiological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%