2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00026-019-00419-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Families of Buffered Frobenius Representations of Overpartitions

Abstract: We generalize the generating series of the Dyson ranks and M 2ranks of overpartitions to obtain k-fold variants, and give a combinatorial interpretation of each. The k-fold generating series correspond to the full ranks of two families of buffered Frobenius representations, which generalize Lovejoy's first and second Frobenius representations of overpartitions, respectively.1 This convention ensures that mirroring the diagram across its main diagonal will produce the Young tableau of another overpartition, mor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, (4.9) implies [10, Corollary 1.5]. Second, do similar congruences and/or relations exist for total number of parts functions associated to other partitions statistics, for example, ranks of Durfee symbols [1], the first and second residual crank for overpartitions [7], the k-rank [12] or the M d -rank for overpartitions [17], [23]? Finally, a mock modular perspective (such as in [13], [15], [16] or [22]) which explains the occurrences of (1.1), (1.2), (1.4)-(1.7) and (4.3)-(4.16) would be most welcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here, (4.9) implies [10, Corollary 1.5]. Second, do similar congruences and/or relations exist for total number of parts functions associated to other partitions statistics, for example, ranks of Durfee symbols [1], the first and second residual crank for overpartitions [7], the k-rank [12] or the M d -rank for overpartitions [17], [23]? Finally, a mock modular perspective (such as in [13], [15], [16] or [22]) which explains the occurrences of (1.1), (1.2), (1.4)-(1.7) and (4.3)-(4.16) would be most welcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At this point in time, we are not aware of a suitable rank function to pair with the kth residual crank function for k > 2. Although the first author's M k -ranks [Mor19] generalize the rank functions studied by Bringmann, Lovejoy, and Osburn, these fail to produce the expected spt relations. Where we would expect…”
Section: Future Studymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…can be shown using the same argument as in Larsen, Rust, and Swisher [LRS14]. Here, N[d] k (n) is the kth positive moment of the M d -rank of overpartitions, which is due to the second author [Mor19]. These rank moments have the following generating series n≥0…”
Section: Further Studymentioning
confidence: 99%