Two faces of triel bonds in boron trihalide complexes

Abstract

The N⋅⋅⋅B triel bonds in complexes of boron trihalides, BX (X = F, Cl, Br, and I), with species acting as Lewis bases through the nitrogen center, NH , N , and HCN, are analyzed theoretically (MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ calculations). It is confirmed that stronger Lewis acid properties of the boron center are observed for the BCl moiety than for the BF one in complexes with the strong Lewis base (NH ); while the opposite order is observed for complexes with the weak Lewis base (N ). The BX NCH complexes (for X = Cl, Br, and I) are characterized by two tautomeric forms and by two corresponding N⋅⋅⋅B distances, the shorter one possesses characteristics of the covalent bond. In a case of the BF NCH complex one energetic minimum is observed. Ab initio calculations are supported by an analysis of molecular electrostatic potentials (EPs) and electron density distributions. The quantum theory of 'atoms in molecules' and the decomposition of the energy of interaction are applied. The aforementioned acidity orders as well as the existence of two tautomers for some of complexes result partly from the electrostatic interactions' balance; the EP distribution is different for the BF species than for the other BX species where X = Cl, Br, and I. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Carbene triel bonds between TrR3 (Tr = B, Al) and N‐heterocyclic carbenes

“…For most types of triel‐bonded complexes, both electrostatic and polarization components are linearly related to the total interaction energy . The expected linear relationship is noted here by the black points in Figure for the electrostatic component, but polarization energy (red) fails to obey this pattern.…”

“…[48] Clearly, both types of electron donors engage in a weaker triel bond than does NHC. The interaction energy is less than −50.4 kcal/mol when BX 3 binds with NH 3 , [58] which is smaller than that in NHCÁÁÁBX 3 , further supporting the notion that a carbene C lone pair is a stronger nucleophile than is the N lone pair.…”

Anion Recognition by Neutral Chalcogen Bonding Receptors: Experimental and Theoretical Investigations

“…The hydrogen bond is undoubtedly the most important and prevalent noncovalent interaction . However, other elements belonging to groups 14 to 17 of the periodic table have a similar function . The electron density distribution in covalently bonded heavy atoms of groups 15 to 17 is anisotropic and frequently presents regions of positive (σ‐holes) and negative (σ‐lumps) electron density .…”

Charge‐Assisted Chalcogen Bonds: CSD and DFT Analyses and Biological Implication in Glucosidase Inhibitors

“…Among the comprehensive topic of noncovalent interactions, the hydrogen bond (HB) is undoubtedly the most important and prevalent bonding . In HB the hydrogen atom is the electrophilic site, but other elements of the p‐block of the periodic table can behave as electrophile and give rise to attractive interactions with electron rich sites . The electron density distribution in covalently bonded atoms of p‐block is frequently anisotropic and presents regions of lower or higher electron density where the electrostatic potential is typically positive or negative, respectively .…”