2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two estimates of the distance to the Galactic Centre

Abstract: We use recently updated globular cluster distances to estimate the distance to the Galactic Centre, finding 7.4 ± 0.2| stat ± 0.2| sys kpc from symmetry considerations, including a trough at the Galactic Centre and peaks denoting the position of the bar. We recalibrate the red clump magnitude from Hipparcos stars, finding a skew distribution and a significant difference between peak and mean magnitudes. We find an estimate from stars in the periphery of the bulge using 2MASS, R 0 = 7.5 ± 0.3 kpc, in agreement … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(115 reference statements)
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are no globular clusters in the analyzed area according to the Francis & Anderson (2014) catalog, their presence in nearby regions could bias the number of RR Lyrae stars found. This possible effect on our catalog was investigated on the three closest globular clusters to our sample of RRab stars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are no globular clusters in the analyzed area according to the Francis & Anderson (2014) catalog, their presence in nearby regions could bias the number of RR Lyrae stars found. This possible effect on our catalog was investigated on the three closest globular clusters to our sample of RRab stars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centroid of the distance distribution of globular clusters, the basis for the famous early work by Shapley (1918), continues to be used for estimating R0 (Bica et al 2006;Francis & Anderson 2014). These studies are based on the catalogue of Harris (2010, and earlier), where individual distances are estimated from HB magnitudes and reddening.…”
Section: Secondary Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the direct Galactic Center distance determinations by the Genzel and Ghez groups are arguably the most precise Galactic Center distance estimates available to date, their derivation is very sensitive to a range of modeling assumptions (e.g., Gillessen et al 2009;Francis & Anderson 2014). Two potentially important issues the underlying assumption of Keplerian motion of the S stars around Sgr A*.…”
Section: Direct Distance Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Francis & Anderson (2014) pointed out that the corrections for the relativistic geodetic effect (de Sitter precession) attempted by Gillessen et al (2009) are based on the assumption that this precession arises in the Schwarzschild metric, whereas one should instead adopt the Kerr metric associated with a relativistically rotating central black hole. In turn, this leads to 'frame dragging' (also known as the Lense-Thirring effect), which is predicted to affect both the S stars' orbits and the light paths into the line of sight.…”
Section: Direct Distance Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%