1990
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(90)90318-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two ELISA's for measurement of protein S, and their use in the laboratory diagnosis of protein S deficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The laboratory methods used and the interpretation of results for all kits were as specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Levels of proteins C, S, and antithrombin III were measured by ELISA as described elsewhere [17][18][19], in each case with use of the appropriate rabbit antihuman antibody (Dako).…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laboratory methods used and the interpretation of results for all kits were as specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Levels of proteins C, S, and antithrombin III were measured by ELISA as described elsewhere [17][18][19], in each case with use of the appropriate rabbit antihuman antibody (Dako).…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PS Measurements-Total PS antigen levels in culture media were determined by ELISA as described previously (37), with the following modifications. ELISA plates were coated with goat anti-human PS IgG (Kordia, Leiden, The Netherlands) overnight at 4°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard laboratory procedures were used for the following tests: activated protein C ratio, protein C activity, von Willebrand factor, lupus anticoagulant (Behring Coagulation System, Dade Behring Inc), factor VIII, antithrombin III (STA, Diagnostica Stago), and protein S with the use of an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. 7 The factor V Leiden mutation was determined only if the activated protein C ratio was abnormal. 8 Factor II mutation was determined according to a technique as previously described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%