2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Echelon Vehicle Routing Problem: A satellite location analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The models are always only approaching of the reality, because the real systems are usually more complex than the models are. The model is always to be understood as simplification of the original (Crainic et al, 2010). The result of process of modeling is conceptual model of the studied real system / real process / experimentally measured data.…”
Section: System Multidisciplinary Approach In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models are always only approaching of the reality, because the real systems are usually more complex than the models are. The model is always to be understood as simplification of the original (Crainic et al, 2010). The result of process of modeling is conceptual model of the studied real system / real process / experimentally measured data.…”
Section: System Multidisciplinary Approach In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-S2. Instances taken from [7]. We consider the instances with 50 customers, combining three customer distributions and three satellites location patterns, with 2, 3, and 5 satellites.…”
Section: Computational Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four basic 2E-VRP instance sets were used in this paper, i.e. sets 2 and 3 proposed by Perboli, Tadei, and Vigo (2011), set 4 proposed by Crainic et al (2010) and set 5 of Hemmelmayr, Cordeau, and Crainic (2012). Sets 2 and 3 of Perboli, Tadei, and Vigo (2011) represent 39 instances that include 21-50 customers.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In set 2, the satellites are placed randomly, whereas in set 3, they are distributed on the external border of an area determined by the customer distribution. Set 4 of Crainic et al (2010) consists of 54 instances, of which instances 1-18 have 2 satellites, instances 19-36 have 3 satellites and instances 37-54 have 5 satellites. Each instance in set 4 has 50 customers, and the customer distributions exhibit three patterns: random, centroids and quadrants.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%