The honeybees Apis mellifera ligustica (Aml) and Apis cerana cerana (Acc) are two different western and eastern bee species that
evolved
in distinct ecologies and developed specific antennal olfactory systems
for their survival. Knowledge of how their antennal olfactory systems
function in regards to the success of each respective bee species
is scarce. We compared the antennal morphology and proteome between
respective sexually mature drones and foraging workers of both species
using a scanning electron microscope, two-dimensional electrophoresis,
mass spectrometry, bioinformatics, and quantitative real-time polymerase
chain reaction. Despite the general similarities in antennal morphology
of the drone and worker bees between the two species, a total of 106
and 100 proteins altered their expression in the drones' and the workers'
antennae, respectively. This suggests that the differences in the
olfactory function of each respective bee are supported by the change
of their proteome. Of the 106 proteins that altered their expression
in the drones, 72 (68%) and 34 (32%) were overexpressed in the drones
of Aml and Acc, respectively. The
antennae of the Aml drones were built up by the highly
expressed proteins that were involved in carbohydrate metabolism and
energy production, molecular transporters, antioxidation, and fatty
acid metabolism in contrast to the Acc drones. This
is believed to enhance the antennal olfactory functions of the Aml drones as compared to the Acc drones
during their mating flight. Likewise, of the 100 proteins with expression
changes between the worker bees of the two species, 67% were expressed
in higher levels in the antennae of Aml worker contrasting
to 33% in the Acc worker. The overall higher expressions
of proteins related to carbohydrate metabolism and energy production,
molecular transporters, and antioxidation in the Aml workers compared with the Acc workers indicate
the Aml workers require more antennal proteins for
their olfactory mechanisms to perform efficient foraging activities
than do the Acc worker bees. These data decipher
the mechanisms of the western and eastern drone and worker bees acting
in response to their different olfactory system in their distinct
ecosystem.