1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199707)19:3<156::aid-gcc4>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two discrete regions of deletion at 7q in uterine leiomyomas

Abstract: This study further defines the region of consistent deletion of chromosome 7 in uterine leiomyomas. We have examined 74 leiomyomas for allelic loss of markers spanning the 7q22 region defined by markers D7S518 and D7S471. Forty tumors with cytogenetically defined 7q deletions, twenty‐nine tumors without cytogenetically visible 7q deletions, and five tumors with no cytogenetic information were examined for allelic loss of D7S518, D7S666, D7S515, D7S658, D7S496, D7S692, and D7S471. Loss of heterozygosity for one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the lack of chromosomal deletions in two tumours showing LOH indicates that mitotic recombination, rather than deletion, may be the cause of LOH in some fibroids (Gupta et al, 1997;Blackburn et al, 2004). Since the previous deletion mapping efforts on fibroids were conducted before the final version of the human genetic map was available, some of the marker information has changed (Ishwad et al, 1995(Ishwad et al, , 1997van der Heijden et al, 1998;Mao et al, 1999). In particular, the results by van der Heijden et al rely critically on marker D7S501, the published reverse primer of which does not have a perfect match on the 7q22.3 target region in the latest version (v29.35b) of Ensembl (www.ensembl.org) genome browser, thus making the assessment of LOH in our experience nonreproducible (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the lack of chromosomal deletions in two tumours showing LOH indicates that mitotic recombination, rather than deletion, may be the cause of LOH in some fibroids (Gupta et al, 1997;Blackburn et al, 2004). Since the previous deletion mapping efforts on fibroids were conducted before the final version of the human genetic map was available, some of the marker information has changed (Ishwad et al, 1995(Ishwad et al, , 1997van der Heijden et al, 1998;Mao et al, 1999). In particular, the results by van der Heijden et al rely critically on marker D7S501, the published reverse primer of which does not have a perfect match on the 7q22.3 target region in the latest version (v29.35b) of Ensembl (www.ensembl.org) genome browser, thus making the assessment of LOH in our experience nonreproducible (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the results by van der Heijden et al rely critically on marker D7S501, the published reverse primer of which does not have a perfect match on the 7q22.3 target region in the latest version (v29.35b) of Ensembl (www.ensembl.org) genome browser, thus making the assessment of LOH in our experience nonreproducible (data not shown). When this and the possibility of a small homozygous deletion as the explanation for retention of heterozygosity (Cairns et al, 1994;Ishwad et al, 1997) are taken into account, the former smallest commonly deleted region was 5.3 Mb and flanked by markers D7S518 and D7S496. Our data further reduces the commonly deleted region to be flanked by markers 7qAC005070 and D7S496, a region of only 2.3 Mb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Deletions on chromosome 7q, del(7q), were found in approximately 35% of cases with cytogenetic abnormalities (128/ 366), and the smallest commonly deleted region of 7q was mapped to band 7q22. 1,[7][8][9][10] The high proportion of cytogenetically detectable deletions of 7q22 in leiomyomas and other types of cancer suggests that a tumor-suppressor gene may be located within this chromosomal region. 1,9 We previously reported that CUTL1 was present in a commonly deleted region in 7/50 uterine leiomyoma samples examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region of LOH at 7q22 in every case included one or more of three polymorphic markers that are located within the CUTL1 gene. LOH of 7q22 has also been documented in the case of human uterine leiomyomas (Zeng et al, 1997;Ishwad et al, 1997). Interestingly, in both leiomyomas and mammary tumors induced in transgenic mice expressing the Polyomavirus (PyV) large T (LT) antigen, immunocomplexes of CUTL1 and PyV LT antigen were detected (Webster et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%