2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-007-9075-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Dimensions of Student Ownership of Learning During Small-Group Work in Physics

Abstract: The theoretical framework student ownership of learning is developed both theoretically and with qualitative research. The metaphor Bownership^is related to the process towards meaning making and understanding and is seen as relevant especially to improve physics instruction. The dimension group ownership of learning refers to the groups_ actions of choice and control of the management of the task; how the task is determined, performed and finally reported. The other dimension, the individual student ownership… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
54
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to operationalise how affective factors are involved in students' interaction with each other and tasks at hand is to look for indications of their personal or collective ownership of their learning (Enghag and Niedderer 2008). Example indications of ownership in a small-group setting would include if a group of students chooses to work with a particular task in an area of study, and is in control of how to perform and report the work, or when an individual student returns to a certain issue throughout the work, and is not satisfied until he or she has settled on an answer.…”
Section: The Social and Affective Dimensions Of Science Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One way to operationalise how affective factors are involved in students' interaction with each other and tasks at hand is to look for indications of their personal or collective ownership of their learning (Enghag and Niedderer 2008). Example indications of ownership in a small-group setting would include if a group of students chooses to work with a particular task in an area of study, and is in control of how to perform and report the work, or when an individual student returns to a certain issue throughout the work, and is not satisfied until he or she has settled on an answer.…”
Section: The Social and Affective Dimensions Of Science Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the task of investigating the temperature of the mug and the cup was given to the pupils as part of the exercise, their interaction is characterised by engagement in inquiry, and the pupils taking ownership of their own learning (Enghag and Niedderer 2008). This applies to the sustained observation of the two objects throughout the exercise -our previous experience is that older students merely seek to confirm that the plastic cup gets warmer than the coffee mug, and then leave it at that -but in particular also to the emergent instances of instant inquiry.…”
Section: Revisiting the Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Hanauer et al [42] stressed the importance of student input on research questions and strategic decisions about project execution. Many researchers have described the connection between student ownership and students' level of choice, control, and responsibility with respect to a project [5][6][7]38,39,[45][46][47]; hence, this dimension of ownership is related to Wiley's definition of ownership as right and responsibility. Importantly, personal agency does not imply unconstrained choice or unregulated autonomy.…”
Section: B Interaction Between Student and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency and choice of control over a task or outcome (Enghag & Niedderer, 2008) experts with vast amounts of knowledge on the team . .…”
Section: Buy-in/ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%