2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04542-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional ultrasound measurements vs. magnetic resonance imaging-derived ventricular volume of preterm infants with germinal matrix intraventricular haemorrhage

Abstract: Background Post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation can be measured accurately by MRI. However, two-dimensional (2-D) cranial US can be used at the bedside on a daily basis. Objective To assess whether the ventricular volume can be determined accurately using US. Materials and methods We included 31 preterm infants with germinal matrix intraventricular haemorrhage. Two-dimensional cranial US images were acquired and the ventricular index, anterior horn width and thalamo-occipital distance were measured. In add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As 3D US is not widely available we have focused on its utility to make 2D US measurements reliable compared to a 3D US manual segmentation and to both linear and volumetric MRI measures. However, this study reinforces the potential role 3D US has in the NICU which has been previously recognized by other authors ( 26 , 27 ) and by our group ( 14 , 16 , 28 , 29 ). 3D allows navigation through the three planes once a whole brain acquisition has been obtained, is faster than 2D US and allows review offline of any possible section of interest instead of having a static 2D image saved ( 30 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As 3D US is not widely available we have focused on its utility to make 2D US measurements reliable compared to a 3D US manual segmentation and to both linear and volumetric MRI measures. However, this study reinforces the potential role 3D US has in the NICU which has been previously recognized by other authors ( 26 , 27 ) and by our group ( 14 , 16 , 28 , 29 ). 3D allows navigation through the three planes once a whole brain acquisition has been obtained, is faster than 2D US and allows review offline of any possible section of interest instead of having a static 2D image saved ( 30 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, MRI is not easy to perform during the first weeks of life when clinical conditions of newborns are critical, even if this technique is considered the gold standard for the study of cerebral structures' measurements (7). Recently, it has been demonstrated that cranial ultrasound (cUS) can be reliably used to monitor cerebral growth in preterm infants (6,(8)(9)(10)(11). The cUS is a low-cost bedside technique, repeatable as often as necessary, available, and widely used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been demonstrated that cranial ultrasound (cUS) can be reliably used to monitor cerebral growth in preterm infants (6,(8)(9)(10)(11). The cUS is a low-cost bedside technique, repeatable as often as necessary, available, and widely used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (8). Starting from these considerations, we aimed to study the effects of high protein supply on early cerebral volume, through serial cUS examinations in preterm neonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution ultrasound equipment, early and serial cUS, and new classifications for WMI at TEA that include the concept of white matter loss are therefore critical [ 30 , 36 40 ]. In this study, two experienced examiners evaluated all the available cUS scans, taking into account the progression profile of the white matter echogenicity and the presence of cysts, as well as signs of white matter loss (ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly) in the cUS conducted at TEA, which have shown a good correlation with MRI findings [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%