2001
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.105.409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Tensor Product Variational Formulation

Abstract: We propose a numerical self-consistent method for 3D classical lattice models, which optimizes the variational state written as two-dimensional product of tensors. The variational partition function is calculated by the corner transfer matrix renormalization group (CTMRG), which is a variant of the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG). Numerical efficiency of the method is observed via its application to the 3D Ising model.Comment: 9 pages, 4 figures, submitted to Prog. Theor. Phy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
178
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculation on 16 × 16 lattice shows that the ground states below δ ∼ 0.12 and above δ ∼ 0.2 show the stripe orders with (l c , l s ) = (8,16) and (l c , l s ) = (4, 8), respectively, while roughly in the region 0.12 < δ < 0.2 the energy is convex implying the phase separation. However, one can speculate that other periodicities or structures of the stripes with the period between (8,16) and (4,8) that are not compatible with this size may have slightly lower energy filling the convexity like t-J model 51 and precludes the phase separation in this region. From the energy curve in Fig.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our calculation on 16 × 16 lattice shows that the ground states below δ ∼ 0.12 and above δ ∼ 0.2 show the stripe orders with (l c , l s ) = (8,16) and (l c , l s ) = (4, 8), respectively, while roughly in the region 0.12 < δ < 0.2 the energy is convex implying the phase separation. However, one can speculate that other periodicities or structures of the stripes with the period between (8,16) and (4,8) that are not compatible with this size may have slightly lower energy filling the convexity like t-J model 51 and precludes the phase separation in this region. From the energy curve in Fig.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…14. The peak of spin structure factor is at 3π 4 , π , and the peak of the charge structure factor is at π 2 , 0 , which indicate that the ground state has a stripe order with (l c , l s ) = (4,8). The reduction of the period with the increasing hole concentration is intuitively understood from the deceasing mean hole distance with doping and also consistent with the experimental indications of the diffuse peak in neutron scattering in the cuprates 47,48 .…”
Section: Spin and Charge Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This approach, however, suffers from a slow decay in eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix, where the target scheme in the RG transformation was not appropriate from the modern view point. Complementary direct variational approaches based on the 2D tensor product state 18,19 , or the 2D projected entangled pair state [20][21][22][23][24] has been applied to the higher-dimensional problems. Recently, Xie et al proposed an improved tensor RG method 25 combined with the higher order singular value decomposition (HOSVD) 26 , which has been abbreviated as HOTRG 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a new class of numerical methods which combine the renormalization group techniques [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] with the tensor-network representation of quantum many-body states or partition functions of statistical models [17][18][19][20][21][22] has been developed. These methods have played an important role in the study of strongly correlated problems, especially in two or higher dimensions [16,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%