1996
DOI: 10.1364/ol.21.000324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional steady-state photorefractive screening solitons

Abstract: We study experimentally steady-state photorefractive screening solitons trapped in both transverse dimensionsand measure their beam profiles as they propagate throughout the crystal. The solitons are observed to be axially symmetric, and they self-bend. We characterize the soliton dependence on the optical intensity, appliedelectric-field strength, and beam diameter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, the photorefractive nonlinearity is anisotropic [13], which makes it non-ideal to test our model. However, many experimental results suggest that for a large range of parameters, the anisotropy is fairly small: isolated 3D solitons are almost fully circular [14], and planar collisions between 3D coherent solitons are almost fully isotropic [15], except for a special case, e.g., when the collision plane is normal to the c-axis of the crystal and for a particular initial distance between the solitons [16]. In this respect, even though the photorefractive nonlinearity is not isotropic in 3D, one can still employ it to qualitatively study the predictions of our theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, the photorefractive nonlinearity is anisotropic [13], which makes it non-ideal to test our model. However, many experimental results suggest that for a large range of parameters, the anisotropy is fairly small: isolated 3D solitons are almost fully circular [14], and planar collisions between 3D coherent solitons are almost fully isotropic [15], except for a special case, e.g., when the collision plane is normal to the c-axis of the crystal and for a particular initial distance between the solitons [16]. In this respect, even though the photorefractive nonlinearity is not isotropic in 3D, one can still employ it to qualitatively study the predictions of our theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38). However, in practice, by suitably choosing the experimental geometry one can find a crystalline configuration that does not rotate the polarization and which has one electro-optic coefficient much larger than the others (for example, strontium barium niobate 24,27,30,31 ) in such a way that an optical field initially polarized along the x axis maintains its linear polarization; then the problem can be adequately formulated as a scalar one.…”
Section: ؉ 1-dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ٌ ϭ ͑ ‫,ץ/ץ‬ ‫,ץ/ץ‬ ‫,͒ץ/ץ‬ ٌ Ќ ϭ ‫,ץ/ץ͑‬ ‫.͒ץ/ץ‬ (30) By assuming hereafter that the bias field is generated by voltage V applied to the crystal faces orthogonal to the x axis, we observe that in the trivial case in which the intensity is constant in the whole crystal, ͉u͉ 2 ϭ ͉u ϱ ͉ 2 , the basic Eqs. (27), (25), and (26), together with boundary condition (6) (and neglecting fringe effects at the crystal surface), have the simple solution…”
Section: ؉ 1-dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations