A new approach to the numerical modeling of high-pressure inductive plasmas is presented. The governing magnetohydrodynamicequations are discretized in a second-order accurate nite volumemanner. A pressure-stabilized ow eld solver is introduced as an alternative to the staggered-mesh solvers used in traditional algorithms. It is argued that the widely used integral boundary formulation for the electric eld is computationally expensive and cannot be incorporated into an ef cient iterative solution procedure. A far-eld formulation of the electric eld is adopted instead, such that state-of-the-art iterative methods can be applied to speed up the calculation. The discretized equations are solved through a damped Picard method and an approximate and a full Newton method. Ef cient linear algebra methods are used to solve the linear systems arising from the iterative methods. An appropriate linearization of the (strongly positive) joule heating source term is found to be important for the convergence at the linear level. The new model is tested on a 3-species argon and an 11-species air inductive plasma computation. The proposed damped Picard iterative method is found to be very robust during the initial iterations, but does not converge well thereafter. The approximate Newton method converges substantially better. Finally, the full Newton method yields rapid quadratic convergence rates at the expense of an increase in storage. Taking into account both speed of convergence and memory use, the approximate Newton method is considered to be optimal.
NomenclatureCFL = damping parameter similar to the Courant number D{J } = block diagonal of the Jacobian/Picard matrix J E = total electric-eld amplitude (complex quantity), V¢ m ¡ 1 ; global vector containing electric-eld variables E = total electric eld (radio frequency), V¢ m ¡ 1 E P = electric-eld amplitude generated by plasma (complex quantity), V¢ m ¡ 1 E V = electric-eld amplitude generated by inductor in absence of plasma (complex quantity), V¢ m ¡ 1 F r = radial component of Lorentz force per unit volume, N¢ m ¡ 3 F z = axial component of Lorentz force per unit volume, N¢ m ¡ 3 f = torch operating frequency, Hz f m = discrete mass ux in axial direction, kg¢ m ¡ 2 ¢ s ¡ 1 h = internal enthalpy per unit mass, J¢ kg ¡ 1 I C = current through outer inductor, A J E = electric-eld Jacobian matrix J P = Picard matrix J Q = total Jacobian matrix J U = ow eld Jacobian matrix n e = Number density of electrons, m ¡ 3 P joule = joule heating source term, W¢ m ¡ 3 P rad = radiative loss term, W¢ m ¡ 3 p = static pressure, N¢ m ¡ 2 Q = total solution vector ( ow eld plus electric eld) q z, r = conductive heat uxes,W¢ m ¡ 2 R = inner radius of quartz tube, m Re D z = Reynolds number based on cell length in z direction R E Steenweg-op-Waterloo; vdabeele@vki.ac.be. Student Member AIAA. † Professor, Department of Aeronautics and Aerospace, 72 Steenweg-opWaterloo. Senior Member AIAA.
R Q= total residual R U = ow eld residual r = radial distance from torch axis, m T = temperature, K U = o...