2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2012.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional radiation MHD modeling assessment of designs for argon gas puff distributions for future experiments on the refurbished Z machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(16), (17), and (20) is not difficult. However, we cannot start the integration at the axis, g ¼ 0, which is a singular point of this system that corresponds to the limit ln g !…”
Section: Analytic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(16), (17), and (20) is not difficult. However, we cannot start the integration at the axis, g ¼ 0, which is a singular point of this system that corresponds to the limit ln g !…”
Section: Analytic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution for larger g is found by numerical integration of Eqs. (16), (17) together with (20), with initial condition U g 0 ð Þ ¼ U 0 and S g 0 ð Þ ¼ S 0 . The numerical integration proceeds in the direction of increasing g until the trajectory reaches the locus of points representing the post-shock states for strong MHD shocks.…”
Section: Analytic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A doubleshell nozzle of 8 cm diameter [3] was employed to form the load. Based on simulations [4,5], a 1 mg/cm total load mass with inner-to-outer shell mass ratio of 1.6:1 was employed. A Marx charge of 85 kV produced a measured feed current of 16 MA, but significant convolute losses likely resulted in a smaller load current, whose magnitude is the subject of a separate analysis [6].…”
Section: Description Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] is a follow-up to pre-shot calculations of Ref. [4] designed to determine, among several choices, the optimal total mass loading and initial density profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%