1990
DOI: 10.1063/1.346275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional model for material damage due to melting and vaporization during laser irradiation

Abstract: A two-dimensional model is developed for material damage caused by melting and vaporization during pulsed laser irradiation. The problem is formulated by using the energy conservation equation (the Stefan condition) at various points on the solid-liquid and liquid-vapor interfaces. The effect of curvature of the solid-liquid and liquid-vapor interfaces are taken into account and the problem is solved numerically by using the Runge–Kutta method. For determining the maximum damage that can occur during laser irr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contributions of vapor-induced shear forces and recoil pressure in shaping laser produced cavities in solids were shown to have a negligible impact on the cavity axial depth produced for the relatively slow evaporation conditions used in this study [30]. Finally, none of the surface profiles displayed any roughening within the pit that would normally occur if explosive boiling had taken place, and experimental irradiances were well below the phase explosion threshold (10 11 W/cm 2 ) [28].…”
Section: Estimate Of the Evaporation Rates From Surface Profilementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Contributions of vapor-induced shear forces and recoil pressure in shaping laser produced cavities in solids were shown to have a negligible impact on the cavity axial depth produced for the relatively slow evaporation conditions used in this study [30]. Finally, none of the surface profiles displayed any roughening within the pit that would normally occur if explosive boiling had taken place, and experimental irradiances were well below the phase explosion threshold (10 11 W/cm 2 ) [28].…”
Section: Estimate Of the Evaporation Rates From Surface Profilementioning
confidence: 90%
“…More detailed discussion can be found in refs. [21][22][23]. According to the process of laser irradiation without any gas jet assistance, the workpiece experiences heating, melting, and vaporization phases from the viewpoint of hear transfer.…”
Section: Machining Mechanisms and Experimental Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their simulations predicted the formation of broad-spectrum surface pressure fluctuations due to both the turbulent nature of the gas jet and the blunt shock oscillation on the surface. On the other hand, in order to understand the thermal phenomena and temperature fields, several models for the laser drilling process have been reported in the literature [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. For example, Chan and Mazumder [21,22] used multiphase model with the heat equation to analytically analyze the evaporation and melt expulsion and discuss the material removal rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer and liquid expulsion was used by Von Allman [7] to calcuThe field equations are the conservation of mass, the late the velocity and the efficiency of laser drilling as a Navier-Stokes equations (the conservation of linear mofunction of the absorbed intensity. A two-dimensional mentum), and the thermal energy equation in cylindrical model for damage due to melting and vaporization formucoordinates, lated by Kar and Mazumder [8], is based on the energy conservation equation and the effects of various parameters on the depth and the radius of holes drilled are studied the Weber number (the reciprocal of the dimensionless ity, u 0 , are taken as 508 Ȑm which is the diameter of a surface tension coefficient) in the input data. typical laser beam and 10 cm/s, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%