2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.05095.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional mantle convection simulations using an internal state variable model: the role of a history dependent rheology on mantle convection

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe apply the Bammann inelastic internal state variable model (BIISV) to a mantle convection code TERRA2D to investigate the influence of a history dependent solid mechanics model on mantle convection. We compare and contrast the general purpose BIISV model to the commonly used power-law model. We implemented the BIISV model using a radial return algorithm and tested it against previously published mantle convection simulation results for verification. Model constants for the BIISV are used based o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…demonstrates a comparison between vertical velocity profiles of our nonlinear viscoelastic model, power-law model (reported byChristensen (1983),Cserepes (1982),Sherburn (2011), Van der Berg (1995), Yoshida (2012)) at n=3, and the Newtonian model used byPla et al (2010). This Figure is presented in order to compare the results of current CFD simulation (based on the non-linear Giesekus consecutive equation, thermal-pressure dependence properties and depth dependence gravitational acceleration) with previous simpler simulations that used Newtonian and power-law models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…demonstrates a comparison between vertical velocity profiles of our nonlinear viscoelastic model, power-law model (reported byChristensen (1983),Cserepes (1982),Sherburn (2011), Van der Berg (1995), Yoshida (2012)) at n=3, and the Newtonian model used byPla et al (2010). This Figure is presented in order to compare the results of current CFD simulation (based on the non-linear Giesekus consecutive equation, thermal-pressure dependence properties and depth dependence gravitational acceleration) with previous simpler simulations that used Newtonian and power-law models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%