2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9100980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Linear Inversion of GPR Data with a Shifting Zoom along the Observation Line

Abstract: Abstract:Linear inverse scattering problems can be solved by regularized inversion of a matrix, whose calculation and inversion may require significant computing resources, in particular, a significant amount of RAM memory. This effort is dependent on the extent of the investigation domain, which drives a large amount of data to be gathered and a large number of unknowns to be looked for, when this domain becomes electrically large. This leads, in turn, to the problem of inversion of excessively large matrices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth stressing that, despite the adjoint inversion scheme defined by Equation 3is computationally efficient, the computational resources required are in any case high for the imaging problem at hand since large-scale (in terms of probing wavelength) data have to be processed. For this reason, we decided to adopt a shifting zoom approach [69], whose main steps are shown in Figure 5. More specifically, the measurement domain Γ and the survey area D are first partitioned into N partially overlapping subdomains, say Γ i and D i , i = 1, .…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth stressing that, despite the adjoint inversion scheme defined by Equation 3is computationally efficient, the computational resources required are in any case high for the imaging problem at hand since large-scale (in terms of probing wavelength) data have to be processed. For this reason, we decided to adopt a shifting zoom approach [69], whose main steps are shown in Figure 5. More specifically, the measurement domain Γ and the survey area D are first partitioned into N partially overlapping subdomains, say Γ i and D i , i = 1, .…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (4) and (5) form one set of equations that can be solved in the time domain for the up-and downgoing parts of the focusing wave field in the dissipative medium if the up-and downgoing components of the electric field at surface are known in the dissipative and in the effectual medium. Equations (6) and 7form a similar set that can be solved for the focusing wavefield in the effectual medium using the same data. Here, we present how to solve (4)- (5).…”
Section: Electromagnetic Marchenko Equations For a Dissipative Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, most of the works on GPR inversion are based on model driven methods. There are some weaknesses of model driven inversion [5] [6] [7]. For instance, a good starting model is mandatory because the problem is ill-posed and suffers from non-uniqueness in the model solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractioning of the investigation/observation domains, however, poses a relevant problem of reduced view angle [12] for all the targets close to any bound between two adjacent investigation domains. In [13], a method for mitigating such a problem has been introduced, called shifting zoom (or "shift and zoom"), and in [14] it has been applied to the creation of depth slices based on a linear inverse scattering algorithm. In this contribution, thanks to the shifting zoom, we will apply an inverse scattering algorithm to three electrically large sets of data and we will create depth slices based on this procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%