1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(97)00363-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional linear elasticity by the boundary node method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To carry out the numerical integration, the general boundary and crack surface are firstly separated into a series of sub-domains that are being called 'integral cells' in References [37,38]. Some nodes are then selected on each cell.…”
Section: Boundary Element-free Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To carry out the numerical integration, the general boundary and crack surface are firstly separated into a series of sub-domains that are being called 'integral cells' in References [37,38]. Some nodes are then selected on each cell.…”
Section: Boundary Element-free Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison purpose, the ratios of crack length to width and height to width are taken as a/w = 0.2 and h/w = 2, respectively [20,21]. The single-side MLS approximation [37,38] is used for the evaluation points that are close to the corner of the outside general boundary. Both electromechanical coupled and uncoupled (e i jk = 0) cases are computed.…”
Section: Inclined Crack In a Rectangular Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the relatively short span of less than a decade, great progress has been made in solid mechanics applications of meshfree methods. Meshfree methods proposed to date include the element-free Galerkin (EFG) method [4], the reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM) [5], h-p clouds [6][7][8], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach [9; 10], the local boundary integral equation (LBIE) method [11; 12], the natural element method (NEM) [13; 14], the generalized ÿnite element method (GFEM) [15], the extended ÿnite element method (X-FEM) [16][17][18], the ÿnite point method (FPM) [19; 20], the ÿnite cloud method (FCM) [21], the boundary cloud method (BCM) [22] and the boundary node method (BNM) [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Meshfree Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the calculation of a geodesic is reduced to calculating the minimum distance between two points lying on a plane which is a straight line. It has been numerically observed (see [21]) that an arbitrary truncation of the range of in uence at the edges still yields overall acceptable results.…”
Section: Moving Least-squares (Mls) Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data structure considerably reduces the task of meshing and a solid model of a 3-D body can be directly used as input for stress analysis. This method has been successfully tried for 2-D problems in potential theory [20] and linear elasticity [21]. Very recently, the method has been extended to solve three-dimensional problems in potential theory by Chati and Mukherjee [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%