2023
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2023.3261928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Eddy-Current Losses Model and Experimental Validation Through Thermal Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These supports (non-magnetic and non-conductive) are produced by 3D printing (see Section 3). According to (27), the PLA thickness should be equal to the height of conductive massive parts, as shown in Figure 18.…”
Section: Experimental Validations 421 Power Conservation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These supports (non-magnetic and non-conductive) are produced by 3D printing (see Section 3). According to (27), the PLA thickness should be equal to the height of conductive massive parts, as shown in Figure 18.…”
Section: Experimental Validations 421 Power Conservation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These supports (non-magnetic and non-conductive) are produced by 3D printing (see Section 3). According to (27), the PLA thickness should be equal to the height of conductive massive parts, as shown in Figure 18. Finally, from these data, the volumic eddy-current losses in the conductive massive parts can be deduced from (…”
Section: Power Conservation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation