2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8793-1_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whole cell proteomic analysis was performed by using 2-D fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) recommended by The Ohio State University Proteomics Shared Resource [30]. U251 cells (1 × 10 7 ) were incubated with 20 mM NaCl or 20 mM LiCl for 24 h. Cell pellets were snap frozen and processed for DIGE analysis by The Ohio State University Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility using the Ettan DIGE system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole cell proteomic analysis was performed by using 2-D fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) recommended by The Ohio State University Proteomics Shared Resource [30]. U251 cells (1 × 10 7 ) were incubated with 20 mM NaCl or 20 mM LiCl for 24 h. Cell pellets were snap frozen and processed for DIGE analysis by The Ohio State University Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility using the Ettan DIGE system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D-DIGE method was originally developed by Minden and co-workers [185,186,187] and has been frequently modified as an efficient protein biochemical tool for studying large-scale changes in protein expression and interaction patterns [182,188,189,190]. The application of the 2D-DIGE technique for the comparative analysis of the skeletal muscle proteome from human and animal specimens has been described in detail in various methods papers [191,192,193,194,195].…”
Section: Top-down Proteomics Of Contractile Proteins From Skeletalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method has similar sensitivity to electrophoretic and conventional LC-MS/MS methods but is superior in terms of simplicity and by way of identification of proteins. The specifications of each proteomics method ( Iwasaki et al, 2010 ; Zhang et al, 2013 ; Imai, 2014 ; Nakata et al, 2015 ; Blundon et al, 2019 ; Lee et al, 2019 ; Kobayashi et al, 2021 ) are summarized in Table 1 .…”
Section: Fluorogenic Derivatization-liquid Chromatography-tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Methods (Fd-lc-ms/ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%