2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional computational framework of meso-scale rigid and line interface elements for masonry structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of Eq (12) has been performed according to a uniform fibre discretation of the adjacent elements, as depicted in Figure 5, where the masonry macroelements p and q, have been discretised according to The shear sliding behaviour of adjacent elements, along the interfaces, being associated to a single degree of freedom, has been characterised according to a uniaxial nonlinear behavior, as clarified in the next section. 13 It is worth to notice that, the choice to concentrate the mechanical properties of the connected elements in zero-thickness interfaces is common to other discrete numerical approaches such for example the applied element method [30]- [34] and the rigid body spring model [35]- [38], however these latter strategies do not operate at the macro-scale.…”
Section: The Interface Stiffness Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of Eq (12) has been performed according to a uniform fibre discretation of the adjacent elements, as depicted in Figure 5, where the masonry macroelements p and q, have been discretised according to The shear sliding behaviour of adjacent elements, along the interfaces, being associated to a single degree of freedom, has been characterised according to a uniaxial nonlinear behavior, as clarified in the next section. 13 It is worth to notice that, the choice to concentrate the mechanical properties of the connected elements in zero-thickness interfaces is common to other discrete numerical approaches such for example the applied element method [30]- [34] and the rigid body spring model [35]- [38], however these latter strategies do not operate at the macro-scale.…”
Section: The Interface Stiffness Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research study is mostly related to the experimental investigation of the seismic behaviour of brick internal partitions. Further studies will be conducted on numerical simulations, considering different refined models, such as [35][36][37].…”
Section: Damage Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,[28][29][30][31][32] The numerical models of URM walls fall mainly into 2 groups. The first group of models is referred to as meso-scale models, and in this approach the mortar joint is represented by interface elements [28][29][30][33][34][35] or by continuum elements and contact and cohesive elements at the interfaces. 36 In the second approach, the mortar and bricks are modeled as a homogenous continuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%