“…In this study, the principal components summarize the major patterns of variation among axonemes isolated from multiple strains and induced to slide in Table 1. Chlamydomonas strains used in this study Strain Structural/motility defect A54-e18 no axonemal structural defect/wild-type motility (Smith and Lefebvre, 1996) 137c no axonemal structural defect/wild-type motility (Harris, 1989) oda1, pf28 lack outer dynein arms/flagella beat with one-half frequency (Kamiya and Okamoto, 1985;Mitchell and Rosenbaum, 1985) ida1, pf30 lacks inner dynein arm subform I1/ reduced beat frequency, altered waveform (Brokaw and Kamiya, 1987) pf30pf28 lacks outer dynein arms and inner dynein arm I1 (Piperno et al, 1990;Smith and Sale, 1992) pf3 defects in dynein regulatory complex/reduced beat frequency, altered waveform (Brokaw and Kamiya, 1987;Kamiya et al, 1991;Piperno et al, 1992) pf6 central apparatus, lacks 1A projection/flagella paralyzed or twitch (Dutcher et al, 1984) cpc1 central apparatus, lacks 1B projection/reduced beat frequency (Mitchell and Sale, 1999) pf14 lacks radial spokes/paralyzed flagella (Piperno et al, 1977) pf17 lacks radial spoke heads/paralyzed flagella (Huang et al, 1981) Fig conditions of low and high Ca 2+ buffer; these analyses revealed major trends in microtubule sliding patterns and the identities of doublet microtubules with active dynein arms. The results of the PCs analyses for each variable set are shown in Fig.…”