Two-Dimensional (2D) Slices Encryption-Based Security Solution for Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Industry

Pham, Giao N.; Lee, Suk-Hwan; Kwon, Oh-Heum; Kwon, Ki-Ryong

doi:10.3390/electronics7050064

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2020, an innovative encryption algorithm for 3D image files was presented by Xu et al [13] leveraging a novel discrete chaotic system [15]. The chaotic characteristics of this system were scrutinized through phase diagrams, Lyapunov exponents, and bifurcation diagrams.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ultra-Lightweight Encryption for STL Files in IoT-based 3D Printing

Yasmin,

Gupta

2023

IJSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the expanding landscape of open hardware and software, the preservation of privacy is paramount for individuals, products, and systems. This study focuses on the security implications pertaining to stereolithography (STL) files in the 3D printing domain, within the scope of the Internet of Things (IoT). As business models increasingly rely on copyrighted content to fuel free services, the application of lightweight encryption becomes crucial in safeguarding STL files utilized in 3D printing operations. In cognizance of the unique needs of the IoT, such as reduced energy consumption, efficient computation, and superior performance metrics, an adaptation of the pioneering Ultra-Lightweight encryption algorithm, modified PRESENT, is proposed. Modifications are made within the substitution box (s-box) of the PRESENT algorithm, yielding a version that consumes less computational time and power. This modified s-box fulfills several evaluation criteria for assessing security parameters, including bijective property, nonlinearity, and strict avalanche criteria, suggesting a substantial resistance to breaches. The application of this customized PRESENT algorithm to secure STL files in IoT-linked 3D printing demonstrates its efficacy in protecting sensitive data, even under the restrictive resources of IoT environments. The findings of this study contribute to the ongoing dialogue on the intersection of security and accessibility in the age of open-source hardware and software.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…𝑏 𝑝 } ∈ (0,1) . The proposed S-box generates 16 distinct output values: [7,11,10,5,3,4,0,8,12,2,14,6,13,1,9,15]. Here Bijectivity criteria are fulfilled as each value has appeared once only.…”

Section: ) Bijectivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultra-Lightweight Encryption for STL Files in IoT-based 3D Printing

Yasmin,

Gupta

2023

IJSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This 3D model is then manufactured one layer at a time. This process can be represented mathematically [42] as…”

Section: Cad Model Security Gapsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Process Security Risks

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has found a unique and prominent role in Industry 4.0 and is rapidly gaining popularity in the manufacturing industry. 3D printing offers many advantages over conventional manufacturing methods, making it an attractive alternative that is more cost-effective and efficient than conventional manufacturing methods. With the Internet of Things (IoT) at the heart of this new movement, control over manufacturing methods now enters the cyber domain, offering endless possibilities in manufacturing automation and optimization. However, as disruptive and innovative as this may seem, there is grave concern about the cyber-security risks involved. These security aspects are often overlooked, particularly by promising new start-ups and parties that are not too familiar with the risks involved in not having proper cyber-security measures in place. This paper explores some of the cyber-security risks involved in the bridge between industrial manufacturing and Industry 4.0, as well as the associated countermeasures already deployed or currently under development. These aspects are then contextualized in terms of Industry 4.0 in order to serve as a basis for and assist with future development in this field.

show abstract