2023
DOI: 10.3390/su151511835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Decades of M-Commerce Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R Biblioshiny

Abstract: The aim of this study is to consolidate the state of mobile commerce consumer research from 2001 to 2022. Based on a systematic literature review employing a bibliometric technique, this study not only reports the significant contributions of authors and their affiliations but also discusses the evolution of m-commerce research over the last two decades. Examination of annual production trends revealed that publications were on the rise all along; the year 2022 clocked the highest number of publications (53 do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using years as a weight, this index considers the volume of works produced yearly since the author's first publication and compared to authors such as Faccio Carvalho, P. C., Cerri, C. E. P., and Cerri, C. C., Cherubin, M. R. had a shorter contribution time, which infers a shorter career time in research development and can make the comparison among the authors in the sample unfair. However, since the m-index provides a fairer comparison between authors with different career times [36], it is possible to support the suggestion that Cherubin, M. R. is one of the most promising authors in the study area. Thus, authors with good numerical productivity at the beginning of their careers tend to present better results for the m-index.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Using years as a weight, this index considers the volume of works produced yearly since the author's first publication and compared to authors such as Faccio Carvalho, P. C., Cerri, C. E. P., and Cerri, C. C., Cherubin, M. R. had a shorter contribution time, which infers a shorter career time in research development and can make the comparison among the authors in the sample unfair. However, since the m-index provides a fairer comparison between authors with different career times [36], it is possible to support the suggestion that Cherubin, M. R. is one of the most promising authors in the study area. Thus, authors with good numerical productivity at the beginning of their careers tend to present better results for the m-index.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Its centrality is defined by the extent of its relationships with other research themes/keywords, and its density refers to the total number of documents that include the same keyword [ 48 ]. A network analysis can examine those key features of different research themes by placing them within four quadrants that refer to a differing degree of development of research themes [ 49 ]: Upper-right quadrant: core or mainstream themes; the motor themes, which are both important and well-developed. They have maximum density and centrality and represent a large portion of the research during a specific time-period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its centrality is defined by the extent of its relationships with other research themes/keywords, and its density refers to the total number of documents that include the same keyword [48]. A network analysis can examine those key features of different research themes by placing them within four quadrants that refer to a differing degree of development of research themes [49]:…”
Section: Concept Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multidimensionality of this intersection necessitates a systematic analysis to unravel the threads that weave together the digital and the tangible in contemporary public library services (Meschede & Henkel, 2019) Scholars, researchers, and practitioners in library and information science are actively contributing to this discourse, grappling with questions of how digital innovations impact public library systems, enhance user experiences, and shape the future of information access. This bibliometric review seeks to encapsulate these intellectual endeavors, providing a panoramic view of the current state of scholarship and guiding future research directions in the dynamic landscape of digital technology in public libraries (Thangavel & Chandra, 2023; Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%