2016
DOI: 10.1017/s003060531500099x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two decades of change in state, pressure and conservation responses in the coastal forest biodiversity hotspot of Tanzania

Abstract: We present an analysis of changes of state, pressures and conservation responses over  years in the Tanzanian portion of the Coastal Forests of Eastern Africa biodiversity hotspot. Baseline data collected during - are compared with data from a synthesis of recently published papers and reports and new field work carried out across the region during -. We show that biodiversity endemism values are largely unchanged, although two new species (amphibian and mammal) have been named and two extrem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and numbers (fig. S2) of LR/PR species, reflecting the high level of plant endemism in the EAMCF ( 34 , 35 ). These species were not flagged as threatened either because they are found in protected areas or because the layers used to detect decline are not precise enough areas in this highly fragmented region (see limits of our study, detailed below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) and numbers (fig. S2) of LR/PR species, reflecting the high level of plant endemism in the EAMCF ( 34 , 35 ). These species were not flagged as threatened either because they are found in protected areas or because the layers used to detect decline are not precise enough areas in this highly fragmented region (see limits of our study, detailed below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the country of São Tomé and Principe has one of the lowest proportions of LT/PT species but is known to have a high rate of species endemism ( 31 ). The land cover layer that we used clearly is not sufficiently resolved for our purposes because native vegetation is indicated as intact in areas where it is in fact known to be highly fragmented ( 34 , 41 ). Our comparison with published IUCN assessments (for 2009 species) shows that most species assessed as Rare in our analysis (i.e., LR/PR) were assessed as CR, EN, or EX under the full IUCN Red List criteria (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in a few cases shape files were not yet available for newly formed shehia resulting from a splitting of a previous shehia, so the original shehia area is shown. Shehia mentioned in the text are Maziwa Ngombe (1), Shenge Juu (2), Tumbe Mashariki (3), Wambaa (4), Chokocho (5), Ukunjwi (6), Pujini (7), Chamboni (8), Shamiani Kiweni (9), Makangale (10), Chumbageni (11), Kojani (12), Wingwi Mapofu 13forest (paralleling successes of village initiatives stemming coastal forest loss on the mainland, Burgess et al, 2017). Such cases had motivated other communities, according to expert witness accounts.…”
Section: An Expansion Of Community Forest Management Agreementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part II -Regional context, data and country profiles and 0.6% per year outside the reserves during the same periods (Burgess et al, 2017;Godoy et al, 2012). (Gorenflo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Monitoring Protected and Conserved Areas -An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%