2011
DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0b013e3182338cc9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Decades After Legislation on Identifiable Donors in Sweden: Are Recipient Couples Ready to be Open About Using Gamete Donation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were cognizant of a child's rights to genetic heritage with a philosophy valuing transparency, honesty, and identity needs for the donor-conceived child and recognizing a child's right to disclosure about circumstances of conception and to biological knowledge. The results of this study are congruent with other studies showing that prospective recipient parents have donor information needs, including knowledge of biological lineage for their children (49)(50)(51) with an increasing proportion of recipient parents now wanting to disclose circumstances of conception (52). Whether donor information exchange needs can be reliably fulfilled through international CBRC donor conception programs, however, has not been put to the empirical test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Participants were cognizant of a child's rights to genetic heritage with a philosophy valuing transparency, honesty, and identity needs for the donor-conceived child and recognizing a child's right to disclosure about circumstances of conception and to biological knowledge. The results of this study are congruent with other studies showing that prospective recipient parents have donor information needs, including knowledge of biological lineage for their children (49)(50)(51) with an increasing proportion of recipient parents now wanting to disclose circumstances of conception (52). Whether donor information exchange needs can be reliably fulfilled through international CBRC donor conception programs, however, has not been put to the empirical test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is interesting to compare this research to a recent study conducted by Isaksson et al (2011). For that study, the researchers examined Swedish oocyte recipients' attitudes regarding information giving to resultant children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little up-to-date knowledge about disclosure levels though they appear to be rising (Soderstrom-Antilla et al, 2010;Isaksson et al, 2011). Lesbian-and single parent-headed families appear the most likely to be open (Jadva et al, 2009;Beeson et al, 2011;Readings et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%