2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc03376d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-coordinate group 14 element(ii) hydrides as reagents for the facile, and sometimes reversible, hydrogermylation/hydrostannylation of unactivated alkenes and alkynes

Abstract: The ambient temperature hydrometallations of a variety of unactivated alkene and alkyne substrates using two-coordinate hydrido-tetrylenes, :E(H)(L†) (E = Ge or Sn; L† = extremely bulky amide), are reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(37 reference statements)
5
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As summarized in Scheme , the formation of IPr⋅GeCl(OSiMe 3 )⋅BH 3 is less favorable (Δ r H =−98.7 kJ mol −1 ; Δ r G =−55.2 kJ mol −1 ) than its Ge II hydride analogue IPr⋅GeH(OSiMe 3 )⋅BH 3 (Δ r H =−123.4 kJ mol −1 ; Δ r G =−77.4 kJ mol −1 ), suggesting the more electronegative chloride ligand reduces the Lewis basicity of the germylene which affords a less thermodynamically stable adduct with BH 3 . This result is interesting as base‐free Ge II hydrides are often much less stable than their chloro counterparts, however the opposite stability trend is found within donor–acceptor complexes and partially explains the stability of the Ge II dihydride complex IPr⋅GeH 2 ⋅BH 3 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As summarized in Scheme , the formation of IPr⋅GeCl(OSiMe 3 )⋅BH 3 is less favorable (Δ r H =−98.7 kJ mol −1 ; Δ r G =−55.2 kJ mol −1 ) than its Ge II hydride analogue IPr⋅GeH(OSiMe 3 )⋅BH 3 (Δ r H =−123.4 kJ mol −1 ; Δ r G =−77.4 kJ mol −1 ), suggesting the more electronegative chloride ligand reduces the Lewis basicity of the germylene which affords a less thermodynamically stable adduct with BH 3 . This result is interesting as base‐free Ge II hydrides are often much less stable than their chloro counterparts, however the opposite stability trend is found within donor–acceptor complexes and partially explains the stability of the Ge II dihydride complex IPr⋅GeH 2 ⋅BH 3 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We surmise that the target stannylene 1 Np Sn is not sufficiently stable for isolation and undergoes a decomposition reaction to the products described, possibly through an initial β‐hydrogen elimination step (see Scheme S1 in the Supporting Information) . Compounds 1 Mes Sn and 1 TMS Sn were structurally characterised by means of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regiospecific hydrometallation of these unsaturated substrates was performed easily. The cycloalkene hydrometallation reactions ( n = 1, 2 or 4) are cleanly reversible (Scheme ) …”
Section: Hydrogermylation Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…β‐Hydride elimination processes were proposed to be of key importance in the reactions between {N(Ar)(Si i Pr 3 )}GeH and cycloocta‐1,5‐diene or 2‐methylbut‐2‐ene, leading to the isomerisation of the alkene skeletons. {N(Ar)(Si i Pr 3 )}Ge(cyclooct‐2‐enyl) and {N(Ar)(Si i Pr 3 )}Ge{C 2 H 4 C(H)Me 2 }, respectively (Scheme ), are thus the reaction products of the subsequent hydrogermylation …”
Section: Hydrogermylation Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%