2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b10921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Component Relativistic Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Methods for Excitation Energies and Ionization Potentials of Atoms and Molecules

Abstract: Two-component relativistic equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods are developed and implemented. Scalar-relativistic and spin-orbit effects are taken into account through a two-component scheme in both Hartree-Fock and correlation calculations. Excitation energies and spin-orbit splittings of atoms and diatomic molecules, and ionization potentials of OsO are reported. The advantage of the present two-component scheme is illustrated particularly for heavy-element systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(142 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appealing features of EOM-CC have made it an extremely popular method for light element systems, and its popularity is growing for heavier species as attested by the number of recent reports in the literature of EOM-CC implementations that take into account relativistic effects. Though some of the latter are based on solving the four-component (4C) Dirac equation for atomic and molecular systems [69][70][71][72][73] and therefore account rigorously for scalar relativistic (SR) effects and spin-orbit coupling (SOC), for reasons of computational efficiency most of them [74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] have been devised in a more approximate framework where SOC is treated to within different degrees of approximation e.g. starting from the spin-free exact two-component (sfX2C) Hamiltonian and including SOC via atomic mean-field (AMF) integrals 83 or perturbatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appealing features of EOM-CC have made it an extremely popular method for light element systems, and its popularity is growing for heavier species as attested by the number of recent reports in the literature of EOM-CC implementations that take into account relativistic effects. Though some of the latter are based on solving the four-component (4C) Dirac equation for atomic and molecular systems [69][70][71][72][73] and therefore account rigorously for scalar relativistic (SR) effects and spin-orbit coupling (SOC), for reasons of computational efficiency most of them [74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] have been devised in a more approximate framework where SOC is treated to within different degrees of approximation e.g. starting from the spin-free exact two-component (sfX2C) Hamiltonian and including SOC via atomic mean-field (AMF) integrals 83 or perturbatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable feature of the ground‐ and excited‐state implementations discussed here is that they rely on the same template metaprogramming techniques employed throughout the rest of ChronusQ (see Appendix) and thus are compatible with both real and complex RHF, UHF, and GHF (including X2C‐HF) reference wave functions. Hence, like many other reported implementations of time‐independent relativistic EOM‐CC theory, the X2C‐based TD‐EOM‐CC2 and TD‐EOM‐CCSD algorithms in ChronusQ incorporate spin‐orbit and scalar relativistic effects from first principles. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this implementation is the only one that incorporates spin‐orbit coupling within a TD EOM‐CC formalism at this time.…”
Section: Current Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is just that the breaking of spin symmetry and the concurrent appearance of complex algebra in the presence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) render not only the implementation difficult but also the computation expensive. Nevertheless, many sophisticated relativistic correlated wave function methods have been made available for use, including four-(4C) or two-component (2C) many-body perturbation theory [22,23], coupled-cluster [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], configuration interaction (CI) [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], multiconfiguration self-consistent field [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%