2002
DOI: 10.1093/elt/56.3.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two complementary modes of foreign language classroom interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Gil (2002), the instruction in the language classroom contains two modes-the pedagogic mode and the natural mode. The former refers to discourse with a pedagogical goal, focusing on form.…”
Section: Problems From the Perspective Of Authenticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Gil (2002), the instruction in the language classroom contains two modes-the pedagogic mode and the natural mode. The former refers to discourse with a pedagogical goal, focusing on form.…”
Section: Problems From the Perspective Of Authenticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nunan 1987; Thornbury 1996;van Lier 1988) assess the communicativeness of classroom discourse in comparison to real-world context. Their way of looking at classroom interaction consists with the philosophy behind communicative language teaching (CLT; Gil 2002). The communicative mode, however, fails to consider the complexity and dynamics of classroom discourse.…”
Section: Modes Of Classroom Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a sociocultural perspective, classroom discourse is a variety of institutional discourse in which learning objectives are inseparable from conversational interactions (Markee and Kasper 2004;Seedhouse 1996;Walsh 2002). Gil (2002) considered EFL classroom interaction as being composed of two complementary modes: the pedagogic and the natural. The former refers to talk with a pedagogic goal (e.g.…”
Section: Modes Of Classroom Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By means of social interactions "teachers and students work together to create the intellectual and practical activities that shape both the form and the content of the target language as well as the processes and outcomes of individual development" (Hall and Verplaetse 2000: 10). Gil (2002) treats foreign language classroom discourse as consisting of two complementary modes, the pedagogical mode and the natural one, with a considerable amount of mingling and overlapping between the two. In her view it is a collectively built dynamic discourse type that aims at providing means for fostering language development.…”
Section: Type Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%