1988
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two classes of N-methyl-D-aspartate recognition sites: differential distribution and differential regulation by glycine.

Abstract: The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, a subtype of excitatory amino acid receptor, mediates synaptic responses in many regions of the central nervous system. This receptor plays a critical role in the mechanisms of both synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity. Although these receptors were generally thought to be a single homogeneous receptor population, we report observations indicating that two anatomically distinct forms of the NMDA-receptor complex exist. buffer, pH 7.0, preincubated at 30°C for 10 min,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
111
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
111
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). Agonistpreferring NMDA receptors defined as NMDA-specific L-~H-glutamate binding in the presence of 6 MM D-AP5 displayed lower relative density levels in lateral thalamic nuclei than NMDAspecific L-'H-glutamate binding, consistent with our previous findings (Monaghan et al, 1988).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1B). Agonistpreferring NMDA receptors defined as NMDA-specific L-~H-glutamate binding in the presence of 6 MM D-AP5 displayed lower relative density levels in lateral thalamic nuclei than NMDAspecific L-'H-glutamate binding, consistent with our previous findings (Monaghan et al, 1988).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…(1) agonist-preferring and (2) antagonist-preferring NMDA receptors (Monaghan et al, 1988;Honor& et al, 1989;Monaghan, 199 1;Sakurai et al, 1993) (3) cerebellar NMDA receptors with distinctive pharmacological properties (Perkins and Stone, 1983;Sekiguchi et al, 1990;Ebert et al, 199 1;Monaghan and Beaton, 1991;O'Shea et al, 1991;Yoneda and Ogita, 1991;Beaton et al, 1992) and (4) with other, unique pharmacological properties (Beaton et al, 1992). The results ofthis report demonstrate that the anatomical distributions of each of the four subtypes show striking parallels to the distributions of individual NR2 subunit mRNAs and that the NR2 subunit is of critical importance in determining receptor subtype pharmacology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus the participation of both S1 and S2 regions possibly provided by a closed form seems to be predictable for agonist binding. Because our NR1 subunits show a decreased affinity for agonists, the homomeric NR1 proteins might exist in an open form, namely an antagonistpreferring form as postulated [25,26]. Co-expression with NR2 subunits is expected to improve the affinity for agonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%