2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-channel nonseparable wavelets statistically matched to 2-D images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ϕ⟩ which implies sgn ′ = 2δ. Using the FT of derivative of a function (24) and delta function, we can write F{sgn ′ } = F{2δ} =⇒ (j2πf ) sgn(f ) = 2. Thus, FT of sgn can be written as…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…ϕ⟩ which implies sgn ′ = 2δ. Using the FT of derivative of a function (24) and delta function, we can write F{sgn ′ } = F{2δ} =⇒ (j2πf ) sgn(f ) = 2. Thus, FT of sgn can be written as…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the duality of FT, we can write 1 πt ⇌ −j sgn(f ) and using the differentiation property of FT from (24), we can write (−1)…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also compare the proposed lifting factoring method with that of other two-dimensional two-channel non-separable wavelet transform. The famous two-dimensional two-channel nonseparable filter bank [3,16,25] On comparing the performance analyses shown in Figs. 9b, c and 10b, c, we can draw the conclusion that the proposed factoring is better than the original two-dimensional two-channel nonseparable filter banks presented in (2) or (3) and the famous biorthogonal symmetric non-separable wavelet transform in sparsity.…”
Section: Sparsity Analysis Of the Proposed Lifting Factoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compare the proposed lifting factoring method with that of other two‐dimensional two‐channel non‐separable wavelet transform. The famous two‐dimensional two‐channel non‐separable filter bank [3, 16, 25] constructed by J. Kovacevic et al is selected for evaluation. The low‐pass and high‐pass filters are listed in (26).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%