2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two cases of fungal keratitis caused by Metarhizium anisopliae

Abstract: We present two cases of keratitis due to Metarhizium anisopliae in geographically separated areas of the United States. The isolates were microscopically similar but morphologically different and were identified by ribosomal DNA sequencing. Both isolates had low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values to caspofungin and micafungin, but high MIC values to amphotericin B. The morphologic and antifungal susceptibility differences between the two isolates indicate possible polyphylogeny of the group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been few reports of ocular infections secondary to the M. anisopliae complex, 2,6 and only 3 reports of Metarhizium keratitis specifically identify M. robertsii as the causative agent. 7 All of the reported cases of M. anisopliae complex ocular infection were in immunocompetent individuals, as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been few reports of ocular infections secondary to the M. anisopliae complex, 2,6 and only 3 reports of Metarhizium keratitis specifically identify M. robertsii as the causative agent. 7 All of the reported cases of M. anisopliae complex ocular infection were in immunocompetent individuals, as in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, it is difficult to culture and mass produce fungi ( Accoti et al, 2021 ). More importantly, these entomopathogenic fungi have been reported to cause symptomatic infections in immuno-compromised humans, raising safety concerns regarding this vector biocontrol agent ( Henke et al, 2002 ; Tucker et al, 2004 ; Lara Oya et al, 2016 ; Goodman et al, 2018 ). These drawbacks render fungi a less attractive vector biocontrol option.…”
Section: Pathogenesis-mediated Vector Biocontrolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential zoonotic activity of EPFs has been reported. M. robertsii, M. guizhouense, M. brunneum and M. pingshaense (specie complex M. anisopliae) were referred as the species involved with human infection, mostly keratitis [305], although two cases of keratitis due to M. anisopliae have been reported in soft contact lens wearers [306]. However, considering a last further recent taxonomic study, comprising the description on new species [20], within the known complexes, it is very hard to state the lack of zoonotic ability of Metarhizium species, used as mycoacaricide.…”
Section: Zoonotic Potential Of Epfsmentioning
confidence: 99%