Abstract:The anesthesiologist plays an important role in preventing wrong-site peripheral nerve blockade and surgery. The protocol developed for "Pre-Anesthetic Site Verification" as a supplement to our preoperative site verification policy is invaluable in preventing wrong-site anesthesia and surgery.
“…The incidence of wrong-site pain procedures is estimated to be 2.66 per (95% confidence interval 1.41-4.54) per 10 000 (13 events in 48,941 procedures) [8]. [9][10][11][12][13][14]. The rarity of published case reports precludes definitive assessment of factors likely to eliminate wrong-site block.…”
Section: Incidence Of Wrong-site Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smearing of a site mark from the operative to nonoperative side has been reported for a lower limb procedure [24]. Of note, Edmonds et al [9] decided against a separate block site mark to avoid confusion with the surgical site marking. In contrast, Nixon and Wheeler [13] recommended to use the word 'BLOCK' at the block site.…”
Section: Verifying All Documentation and Site Markingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivery of high-quality clinical requires teamwork and lack of physician support has been attributed to failure of existing protocols [9]. A patient safety initiative was introduced at Nottingham University Hospitals, UK in association with the Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland [25].…”
Section: Verifying All Documentation and Site Markingmentioning
Preoperative site verification and surgical site marking are mandatory. A time-out should occur immediately before any invasive procedure. Confirming the correct patient and block site with a time-out should occur immediately before all regional anesthetic procedures. If more than one block is performed on one patient, it is recommended that time-out be repeated each time the patient position is changed or separated in time or performed by a different team. The anesthetic team should uniformly implement robust guidelines and checklists to reduce the occurrence of wrong-site regional anesthetic procedures.
“…The incidence of wrong-site pain procedures is estimated to be 2.66 per (95% confidence interval 1.41-4.54) per 10 000 (13 events in 48,941 procedures) [8]. [9][10][11][12][13][14]. The rarity of published case reports precludes definitive assessment of factors likely to eliminate wrong-site block.…”
Section: Incidence Of Wrong-site Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smearing of a site mark from the operative to nonoperative side has been reported for a lower limb procedure [24]. Of note, Edmonds et al [9] decided against a separate block site mark to avoid confusion with the surgical site marking. In contrast, Nixon and Wheeler [13] recommended to use the word 'BLOCK' at the block site.…”
Section: Verifying All Documentation and Site Markingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivery of high-quality clinical requires teamwork and lack of physician support has been attributed to failure of existing protocols [9]. A patient safety initiative was introduced at Nottingham University Hospitals, UK in association with the Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland [25].…”
Section: Verifying All Documentation and Site Markingmentioning
Preoperative site verification and surgical site marking are mandatory. A time-out should occur immediately before any invasive procedure. Confirming the correct patient and block site with a time-out should occur immediately before all regional anesthetic procedures. If more than one block is performed on one patient, it is recommended that time-out be repeated each time the patient position is changed or separated in time or performed by a different team. The anesthetic team should uniformly implement robust guidelines and checklists to reduce the occurrence of wrong-site regional anesthetic procedures.
“…In a field proudly featuring exceptional achievements of nerve localization, imaging, nerve stimulation and reductions in mortality and morbidity, it may seem trivial and incongruous to discuss the (seemingly) simple concept of wrong-sided procedures [24]. It is not trivial.…”
Section: Wrong-sided and Wrong-site Proceduresmentioning
Specific needle shapes, appropriate pharmacologic resuscitation from intravascular injection of local anesthetics and institutional procedures to positively identify patients and the correct block location are all part of a strategy to minimize the occurrence of adverse outcomes and to mitigate the consequences of those adverse events when they do occur. More importantly, these are changes that can be instituted immediately with minimal expense to the institution and great benefit to the patient.
“…Spinal surgery done at the wrong level 5 Peripheral nerve block performed on the wrong extremity 6 Surgery on the wrong limb or digit 7,8 Extraction of the wrong tooth 9 Kidney removed from the wrong side 10 Operation on the wrong eye 11 Operation on the wrong side of the brain 12 Hernia operation on the wrong side 13 Removal of the wrong breast 14 Chest tube inserted into the wrong side 15 Box 2. 05.edozien.txt.01 8/16/05 12:01 PM Page 2 orthopaedic/podiatric surgery; 20% to general surgery; 14% to neurosurgery; 11% to urological surgery; and the remaining 14% to dental/oral maxillofacial, cardiovascular-thoracic, ear-nose-throat, and ophthalmologic surgery.…”
Section: Examples Of Surgery Performed At the Incorrect Sitementioning
Various studies across the world suggest that, on average, one in every ten patients admitted to hospital suffer harm from tests or treatments intended to help them. Such accidental injury is more likely to happen in some parts of the hospital than others. About 7 million operations are performed annually on patients admitted to hospitals in England and Wales, 1 so a large number of patients are exposed to errors and deviations from recommended practice, and some will suffer injury as a result. This paper describes some patient safety problems that occur in operating theatres and suggests ways to promote safety.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.