1996
DOI: 10.1016/0008-6215(95)00311-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-bond 13C-13C spin-coupling constants in carbohydrates: effect of structure on coupling magnitude and sign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
63
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
16
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results provide experimental confirmation of the (AMX) which includes the coupling constant whose sign is under investigation and a 1 J CC and/or 3 J CC value of known 2 J CCC and 2 J COC sign predictions made by the projection resultant method (14) and provide the first experimental positive sign as an internal reference. However, selective 13 C-labeling is not required for these determinations.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…These results provide experimental confirmation of the (AMX) which includes the coupling constant whose sign is under investigation and a 1 J CC and/or 3 J CC value of known 2 J CCC and 2 J COC sign predictions made by the projection resultant method (14) and provide the first experimental positive sign as an internal reference. However, selective 13 C-labeling is not required for these determinations.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…In recent years the value of long-range 13C-13C coupling constants for the conformational analysis of oligosaccharides has been realized [52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. A principal difficulty with the measurement of these parameters is the requirement for 13C-enriched material-unlike heteronuclear 13C-' H measurements where the -1% natural abundance of I3C is not a substantial sensitivity barrier, 0.01% of 954 33 Conformational Analysis in Solution by NMR molecules will contain two 13C nuclei.…”
Section: ~-' 3~ Coupling-constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the projection sums were calculated from the cosine dependence given by Church et al (21) for the different glycosidic linkages which occur in the polysaccharide of Chart 1. The projection resultants were related to the coupling constants using the data of Scheme 6 in ref 21, producing the approximate correlation illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Chart 1: S Mitis J22 Polysaccharidementioning
confidence: 99%