1982
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(82)90325-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-body abrasion of some polymers against 6–50 μm SiC abrasives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the wear profile for extruded specimens in Figure 2, it is evident that the wear rate has reduced up to 50% in the single-pass testing when compared to the multipass testing. A similar result was earlier published where a significant difference was found between the single and multipass testing for PA6/6 and polycarbonate [26]. The relation between abrasion and grain size was also studied earlier where it is evidenced that an increase in abrasive size leads to a change in mechanism from ploughing to cutting [27].…”
Section: Wear Mechanisms the Repeatability Tests Clearly Showsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparing the wear profile for extruded specimens in Figure 2, it is evident that the wear rate has reduced up to 50% in the single-pass testing when compared to the multipass testing. A similar result was earlier published where a significant difference was found between the single and multipass testing for PA6/6 and polycarbonate [26]. The relation between abrasion and grain size was also studied earlier where it is evidenced that an increase in abrasive size leads to a change in mechanism from ploughing to cutting [27].…”
Section: Wear Mechanisms the Repeatability Tests Clearly Showsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Table 4. This wear rate is typical of deformable polymers at long times in multiple-pass wear (3,24) and also corresponds to the single-pass wear of HDPE over a counterface with a 1 pm surface roughness ( 3 ) , and is several orders of magnitude greater than the wear of a polymer against itself or even against polished steel (24,25).…”
Section: Wear Processesmentioning
confidence: 96%