Two Blades of Grass: The Impact of the Green Revolution

Abstract

We examine the impact of the Green Revolution, defined as the diffusion of high-yielding crop varieties (HYVs), on aggregate economic outcomes in developing countries during the second half of the 20th century. We use time variation in the development and diffusion of HYVs of 10 major crops, and the spatial variation in agro-climatically suitability for growing them, to identify the causal effects of adoption. In a sample of 84 counties, we estimate that a 10 percentage points increase in HYV adoption increases GDP per capita by about 15 percent. This effect is fully accounted for by a combination of the direct effect on crop yields, factor adjustment in agriculture, and structural transformation. Our analysis also reveals that the Green Revolution reduced fertility and that the reduction was only partly offset by decreasing mortality rates. The net effect on population growth was therefore negative.

Glyphosate Use in Agriculture and Birth Outcomes of Surrounding Populations

“…We find no significant effect on the coverage of forest area, natural non-forest area, or total farming area. If anything, point estimates indicate a small increase in forest coverage and a small reduction in total farming area (of very similar magnitudes), consistent with the "Borlaug hypothesis" of increased intensiveness of agricultural activity, and similar to what Gollin et al (2018) documented in a cross-country context.…”

“…All of these factors are likely to be correlated, through various channels, with socioeconomic outcomes. Second, adoption of new agricultural technologies may affect socioeconomic outcomes directly as a result of increased agricultural productivity, as documented by Bustos et al (2016), Gollin et al (2018), and Bharadwaj et al…”

Reduction in global habitat loss from fossil‐fuel‐dependent increases in cropland productivity

“…Adoption of high‐yield seeds, which characterizes the Green Revolution, require greater use of fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation to realize seed potential and result in significant ( p < 0.01) reductions in infant and adult mortality rates (i.e., improved health), fertility, and population growth rate, whereas per capita income increases and harvested area decreases ( p < 0.1) (Gollin et al. 2018).…”

Structural Transformation, Agriculture, Climate and the Environment

“…The competing hypothesis, known as Jevons Paradox, holds that technological advances that boost agricultural profitability incentivize expanding the agricultural frontier. The most compelling empirical analyses fairly consistently find that improvements in crop germplasm, in particular, slowed expansion of the agricultural frontier, relative to appropriate counterfactuals (Stevenson et al 2013;Hertel et al 2014;Gollin et al 2018;Abman and Carney 2020;Pelletier et al 2020).…”