2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10441-007-9017-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Approaches to the Study of the Origin of Life

Abstract: This paper compares two approaches that attempt to explain the origin of life, or biogenesis. The more established approach is one based on chemical principles, whereas a new, yet not widely known approach begins from a physical perspective. According to the first approach, life would have begun with-often organic-compounds. After having developed to a certain level of complexity and mutual dependence within a non-compartmentalised organic soup, they would have assembled into a functioning cell. In contrast, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perturbations imposed on the model are designed to assess the sensitivity of marine Se isotope systematics to large departures from baseline Se cycling in the modern ocean. Using the same model across geological time assumes that assimilatory uptake of Se was an important biochemical pathway throughout, and that Se was incorporated into the biochemistry of cells during the emergence and evolution of life, possibly even before S (Hengeveld, 2007;Hengeveld and Fedonkin, 2007;Rao et al, 2003;Romero et al, 2005;Sun and Caetano-Anollés, 2009). Because the modern Se cycle is dominated by assimilatory reduction and oxidative recycling of DISe, we focus on perturbations where (1) assimilatory DISe uptake in the surface waters is decreased (Perturbation 1), (2) oxidative recycling in the water column and sediments is inhibited (Perturbation 2), (3) dissimilatory Se reduction is increased (Perturbation 3), and (4) the previous perturbations are combined (Perturbation 4 = Perturbations 1 + 2 + 3, Perturbation 5 = Perturbations 1 + 2).…”
Section: Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perturbations imposed on the model are designed to assess the sensitivity of marine Se isotope systematics to large departures from baseline Se cycling in the modern ocean. Using the same model across geological time assumes that assimilatory uptake of Se was an important biochemical pathway throughout, and that Se was incorporated into the biochemistry of cells during the emergence and evolution of life, possibly even before S (Hengeveld, 2007;Hengeveld and Fedonkin, 2007;Rao et al, 2003;Romero et al, 2005;Sun and Caetano-Anollés, 2009). Because the modern Se cycle is dominated by assimilatory reduction and oxidative recycling of DISe, we focus on perturbations where (1) assimilatory DISe uptake in the surface waters is decreased (Perturbation 1), (2) oxidative recycling in the water column and sediments is inhibited (Perturbation 2), (3) dissimilatory Se reduction is increased (Perturbation 3), and (4) the previous perturbations are combined (Perturbation 4 = Perturbations 1 + 2 + 3, Perturbation 5 = Perturbations 1 + 2).…”
Section: Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This puts the problem within the thermodynamic realm. A basic requirement, one that can be met by several properties, therefore differs from a property, physical, chemical, biological, or socio-economic; instead, it defines both the process and the shape of molecules taking part in it (Hengeveld 2007). It defines the properties.…”
Section: R Hengeveld (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various perspectives on evolution of photosynthesis have been reported in literature [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], whereas our understanding of transition from anaerobic to aerobic world is still fragmentary. The recent genomic report on Cfl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%