1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01197027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two approaches for truss topology optimization: a comparison for practical use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional ground structure approach There are two popular approaches to the design of structures for optimal topology. 16,17 The former is to minimize the volume of the structure subject to stress constraints. The latter is to minimize the compliance of the structure imposing a constraint on the maximum volume of the structure.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Topology Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional ground structure approach There are two popular approaches to the design of structures for optimal topology. 16,17 The former is to minimize the volume of the structure subject to stress constraints. The latter is to minimize the compliance of the structure imposing a constraint on the maximum volume of the structure.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Topology Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Aage et al [12] obtained a giga-voxel computational morphogenesis design with unprecedented structural detail for the fullscale wing, which has 1.1 billion elements. Besides, Oberndorfer et al [13] optimized practical engineering stiffened design by the ground structure approach of trusses. Ding et al [14][15][16] proposed a growing and 3 branching tree model to perform the stiffener layout design, which is inspired by the branching system in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%