3rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-1710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two and three-bladed propeller design for the reduction of radiated noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the optimal propeller in aerodynamic terms is defined (i.e., with maximum efficiency). Then, the resulting propeller is further modified in order to improve its acoustic properties [48,58,59]. This is the "classical" procedure for quiet propeller design, but such an iterative process presents some complications.…”
Section: Optimized Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the optimal propeller in aerodynamic terms is defined (i.e., with maximum efficiency). Then, the resulting propeller is further modified in order to improve its acoustic properties [48,58,59]. This is the "classical" procedure for quiet propeller design, but such an iterative process presents some complications.…”
Section: Optimized Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with maximum efficiency). Then, the resulting propeller is further modified in order to improve its acoustic properties [28,38,39]. This is the "classical" procedure for quiet propeller design, but such an iterative process presents some complications.…”
Section: Optimized Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal-resistance parameter B Ra is defined by Eq. (9). Figure 17 presents loiter time and optimal mass breakdown as functions of the internal-resistance parameter.…”
Section: B Motor Speed-constant Parameter B Kvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then this propeller is modified to fulfill other goals. Such a process has been used extensively [7][8][9]. The main disadvantage of such an iterative process is that it does not ensure that the final design will be optimal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%