2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Anatomically and Computationally Distinct Learning Signals Predict Changes to Stimulus-Outcome Associations in Hippocampus

Abstract: SummaryComplex cognitive processes require sophisticated local processing but also interactions between distant brain regions. It is therefore critical to be able to study distant interactions between local computations and the neural representations they act on. Here we report two anatomically and computationally distinct learning signals in lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) and the dopaminergic ventral midbrain (VM) that predict trial-by-trial changes to a basic internal model in hippocampus. To measure lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

26
120
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
26
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to identity-specific signals in pOFC, we found that vmPFC represents different rewards using a general reward value code. This is in line with human imaging studies showing value processing in vmPFC (Plassmann et al, 2007;Chib et al, 2009;Lebreton et al, 2009;Levy and Glimcher, 2011;Howard et al, 2015), as well as studies showing that lesions to the vmPFC and adjacent OFC impair value-based choices (Bechara et al, 2000;Izquierdo et al, 2004;Fellows and Farah, 2007;Camille et al, 2011). However, to our knowledge no human or animal study has tested the effects of vmPFC lesions on behavior in a devaluation task, and it is therefore unclear whether vmPFC is necessary for goal-directed behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to identity-specific signals in pOFC, we found that vmPFC represents different rewards using a general reward value code. This is in line with human imaging studies showing value processing in vmPFC (Plassmann et al, 2007;Chib et al, 2009;Lebreton et al, 2009;Levy and Glimcher, 2011;Howard et al, 2015), as well as studies showing that lesions to the vmPFC and adjacent OFC impair value-based choices (Bechara et al, 2000;Izquierdo et al, 2004;Fellows and Farah, 2007;Camille et al, 2011). However, to our knowledge no human or animal study has tested the effects of vmPFC lesions on behavior in a devaluation task, and it is therefore unclear whether vmPFC is necessary for goal-directed behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Such signals have been identified in the OFC across species (Burke et al, 2008;Sescousse et al, 2010;Klein-Flügge et al, 2013;Howard et al, 2015;Boorman et al, 2016). Importantly, updating of these representations must occur on the fly, and thus without the need for additional stimulus-outcome learning (Dickinson and Balleine, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If every voxel contains 50 cells encoding stimulus A and 50 cells encoding stimulus B, it will be difficult to decode A versus B even using the most sensitive multivariate analysis [108]. fMRI adaptation bypasses this problem by relying on the sensitivity of individual neurons to repeated activation (Barron et al [107] in this issue), and has yielded a wealth of new insights in cognitive neuroscience [109][110][111][112].…”
Section: (D) Fmri Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%