1998
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.1.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between two alternative job stress models-the effort-reward imbalance model and the job strain model-and the risk of coronary heart disease among male and female British civil servants. METHODS: The logistic regression analyses were based on a prospective cohort study (Whitehall II study) comprising 6895 men and 3413 women aged 35 to 55 years. Baseline measures of both job stress models were related to new reports of coronary heart disease over a mean 5.3 years o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

28
404
1
26

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 695 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
28
404
1
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the non-normality distribution, the scale was dichotomised by dividing the responses into tertiles, in line with Bosma et al . [26]. The highest tertile indicated high positive health and the cut-off point was placed on ≥27.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the non-normality distribution, the scale was dichotomised by dividing the responses into tertiles, in line with Bosma et al . [26]. The highest tertile indicated high positive health and the cut-off point was placed on ≥27.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the four studies examining the ERI model, individual scores for effort-reward imbalance were constructed with two different approaches, first, by calculating the ratio of the effort and reward scales and then dividing this ratio into thirds or quartiles (43, 47) and, second, by cross-tabulating the dichotomized scales (6,48). Also regarding the ERI model, the item content of the scales varied between the studies.…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also regarding the ERI model, the item content of the scales varied between the studies. Of the two ERI studies using the British Whitehall II cohort, Bosma et al (48) may have had a more comprehensive measure of ERI, but Kuper et al had a more objective CHD outcome (47). For this reason, two meta-analyses with three Two studies examined the association between organizational injustice and CHD.…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(9) On the other hand, work has also been associated with poorer health outcomes when workplace conditions are not optimal. (13,14,15) In its report on social determinants of health, the World Health Organization noted that stress in the workplace plays Employment as Health Determinant 4 an important role in health. (16) The report suggested that having low decision-making authority or control over one's work is particularly predictive of adverse health outcomes for employees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%