1997
DOI: 10.1121/1.417968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two alternative expressions for the spherical wave expansion of the time domain scalar free-space Green’s function and an application: Scattering by a soft sphere

Abstract: The importance of expanding Green's functions, particularly free-space Green's functions, in terms of orthogonal wave functions is practically self-evident when frequency domain scattering problems are of interest. With the relatively recent and widespread interest in time domain scattering problems, similar expansions of Green's functions are expected to be useful in the time domain. In this paper, two alternative expressions, expanded in terms of orthogonal spherical wave functions, for the free-space time d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of the interpolation function defined in Eq. (24) implies that knowledge of the field at the edge of the observation sphere requires knowledge of samples from incoming rays that reside p t samples exterior to the sphere in all directions. Therefore, when working with sampled field representations, constraints (21) and (22) should be satisfied in terms of T s and R s = R s + p t c t, instead of T s and R s .…”
Section: Closed-form Translation Function For Sampled Field Representmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the use of the interpolation function defined in Eq. (24) implies that knowledge of the field at the edge of the observation sphere requires knowledge of samples from incoming rays that reside p t samples exterior to the sphere in all directions. Therefore, when working with sampled field representations, constraints (21) and (22) should be satisfied in terms of T s and R s = R s + p t c t, instead of T s and R s .…”
Section: Closed-form Translation Function For Sampled Field Representmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in spite of the fact that the last decade has witnessed significant speedup of frequency domain integral equation solvers with the advent of the fast multipole method (FMM) [16][17][18][19], the impedance matrix localization technique [20], the multilevel matrix decomposition algorithm [21], etc. Although the structure of transient wave fields has been well studied [2,6,[22][23][24], to our knowledge no TDIE algorithms with reduced computational complexity have been reported. Recently, preliminary research has indicated that fast methods, similar in spirit to the frequency domain algorithms, can also be developed in the time domain [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both methods have been extended to electromagnetics [44,45]. Compared to [39], the main advantages of TDIE based method lie in the stability and flexibility, because no explicit time domain wave functions is used. Though stable and self-consistent, Laplace based methods involves finding the roots of special functions (recursion rules have to be used).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the fact that mode matching concept is used to extract the time-domain signatures, this type of approach is direct time-domain variant of conventional LorentzMie-Debye approach. However, the method involves explicit convolutions between inverse Fourier transform (IFT) of spherical Hankel and Bessel functions (the IFT of spherical Hankel function only exists in convolution sense according to [39]), which introduces instability especially for high order modes. Recently, for acoustic scattering, Laplace transform based approach [41,42] and TDIE based approach [43] have been proposed to solve the time-dependent scattering problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation