2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-018-0741-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-agent scheduling on a single parallel-batching machine to minimize the weighted sum of the agents’ makespans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We examine the DJSP characteristics and solution approach in the field. The interested readers are referred to recent review papers [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] in the field. The relevant studies in the literature are summarized under three main categories as the static problem, the dynamic problem, and DJSP.…”
Section: Literature Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examine the DJSP characteristics and solution approach in the field. The interested readers are referred to recent review papers [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] in the field. The relevant studies in the literature are summarized under three main categories as the static problem, the dynamic problem, and DJSP.…”
Section: Literature Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the weighted objective method adopts the classic rules, the construction rules or sublots [4,5]. To illustrate, Zhang et al [6] scheduled the jobs from two agents with equal processing times and non-identical job sizes on a single parallel-batching machine by using the objective of minimize the weighted sum of the two Makespan of the jobs from two agents. Speci cally, Zhang et al proved that both the absolute worst-case ratio and the asymptotic worst-case ratio was the weight of one agent [7].…”
Section: E Description Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C max f − c 1 + 2 × c 2 + c 3 /4 c 1 : e best Makespan; c 2 : e most possible Makespan; c 3 : e worst Makespan. 6e robustness of the Makespan[65],C max r C max r − max (c 2 − c 1 ), (c 3 − c 1 ) 􏼈 􏼉7e expected weighted sum of Makespan[6],C max w− s C max w− s − αC max A + (1 − α)C max B αC max A : Equipment A's Makesapn; (1 − α)C max B : Equipment B's C max m− l − 􏽐t 2e d− p + t mat t 2e d− p : Secondary manufacturer's completion time; t mat : e secondary manufacturer matches the transport time of the primary manufacturer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%