2006
DOI: 10.1007/11795490_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Abstractions for Implementing Atomic Objects in Dynamic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the system should exhibit stable periods that last long enough. The following set definition captures this notion of stability [18,31]:…”
Section: Problem Definition and Additional Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the system should exhibit stable periods that last long enough. The following set definition captures this notion of stability [18,31]:…”
Section: Problem Definition and Additional Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure 2). On the reception of such a message, an MSS deterministically chooses an identity among the mobile processes it currently trusts and sends back this identity (lines [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Description Of the Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their solution also tolerates quorums on-line reconfigurations. Some quorum-based solutions have been also proposed to implement atomic objects in dynamic systems where participants may join, leave and crash during the computation, [8,18], [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordinating the work of individual nodes in such decentralized topologies is however difficult, leading to a number of works that aim to provide fundamental coordination services such as consensus in systems whose size might be unknown, and in which participants only have a partial knowledge of each other [2,4,8,12,13,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%