2000
DOI: 10.1067/mse.2000.108389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two 6-year follow-up studies of large and massive rotator cuff tears: Comparison of outcome measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
111
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
111
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Therefore, the FSET does not assess shoulder functions in activities that require sustained use of shoulder muscles but, rather, is an indicator of irritability. Neither reliability nor the relationship for predicting functional outcomes has been determined for the FSET.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Therefore, the FSET does not assess shoulder functions in activities that require sustained use of shoulder muscles but, rather, is an indicator of irritability. Neither reliability nor the relationship for predicting functional outcomes has been determined for the FSET.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Performance tests that assess the functional ability of patients with shoulder problems may provide useful information for making clinical or return-toactivity decisions. A limited number of performance tests have been described to assess shoulder functions, including the Simple Shoulder Endurance Test, 12 the Functional Shoulder Elevation Test (FSET), 10 and function-related tests. 12 suggesting that performance may be too unstable for making decisions about patients.…”
Section: T T Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCQOL score was developed to evaluate large and massive rotator cuff tears 34 . It consists of thirty-four questions that assess (1) symptoms and physical complaints, (2) sports and recreation, (3) work, (4) lifestyle, (5) social issues, and (6) emotional issues.…”
Section: Rotator Cuff Disease Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper-extremity measures are designed to be sensitive to disorders affecting any part of the upper limb; [6][7][8][9] shoulder-specific outcome measures have been developed to examine the impact of a condition on a specific joint; 10,11 and disease-specific shoulder measures focus on aspects of health that tend to be affected by a specific disease or condition. [12][13][14][15][16][17] The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), a disease-specific outcome measure, was developed by researchers at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada, approximately 10 years ago. 16 The developers of the WORC 16 criticized previous shoulder measures for poorly defining techniques for physical examination, weighting items arbitrarily, failing to consult with patients, and using double-barrelled questions, but they were not specific about which measures had which shortcomings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%