2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2983656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twitter and Research: A Systematic Literature Review Through Text Mining

Abstract: Researchers have collected Twitter data to study a wide range of topics. This growing body of literature, however, has not yet been reviewed systematically to synthesize Twitter-related papers. The existing literature review papers have been limited by constraints of traditional methods to manually select and analyze samples of topically related papers. The goals of this retrospective study are to identify dominant topics of Twitter-based research, summarize the temporal trend of topics, and interpret the evol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 293 publications
(228 reference statements)
2
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, a mixed research methodology approach; combining both qualitative and quantitative methods; is used for analysing and measuring the factors that are derived in the Indian context. Mix research designs have better reliability while dealing with user generated content (Oh et al 2015;Karami et al 2020). The first phase of the study draws insights from social media analytics where algorithms can transform user generated content using approaches of descriptive analytics, content analytics and network analytics (Rathore et al 2017;Grover et al 2018;Grover and Kar 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, a mixed research methodology approach; combining both qualitative and quantitative methods; is used for analysing and measuring the factors that are derived in the Indian context. Mix research designs have better reliability while dealing with user generated content (Oh et al 2015;Karami et al 2020). The first phase of the study draws insights from social media analytics where algorithms can transform user generated content using approaches of descriptive analytics, content analytics and network analytics (Rathore et al 2017;Grover et al 2018;Grover and Kar 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast data associated with SNS makes isolating influence difficult, however, there is evidence of not only state sponsored influence, but individuals determined on shaping the nature of SNS and the populations that engage with SNS [7]. Extensive research has already surveyed and defined the hierarchical schema of SNS [8] which have been used in various research studies, for example, text mining research to explore the trending or popular actions [9]. Studies have also defined areas for potential future research [10], while others have applied semantic analysis of SNS to track and assess the influence of content shared across these platforms [11].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach categorizes topics by sorting words into clusters with high semantic similarity. Among the topic models, Latent Dirichlet Allocation model (LDA) (Blei, Ng, & Jordan, 2003) is the most established topic model (Lu, Mei, & Zhai, 2011) LDA is a popular technique that has been utilized for different research applications such as opinion mining (Karami & Elkouri, 2019;Hemsley, Erickson, Jarrahi, & Karami, 2020;Karami & Pendergraft, 2018;Karami, Shah, Vaezi, & Bansal, 2020), F I G U R E 1 Word frequency vs word rank-the vertical line shows the position of top-50 words reviewing literature (Shin et al, 2019;Karami, Lundy, Webb, & Dwivedi, 2020), analyzing sexual harassment stories (Karami, Swan, White, & Ford, 2019;Karami, White, Ford, Swan, & Spinel, 2020), exploring medical documents (Karami, Ghasemi, Sen, Moraes, & Shah, 2019) and health-related comments on social media (Karami & Shaw, 2019;Karami, Webb, & Kitzie, 2018). Applying LDA on a corpus provides two matrices.…”
Section: Topic Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%